Progressives’ Political Tactics, Ego, and Superbowl Ads

I view the Audi Green Police Ad as a singular finger pointing mock of the Obama Administration’s Goal of an American Progressive/Socialist/Communist Nation ‘Utopia.’

The Tebow Ad drew faux outrage from the Progressive Femi-nazis over ‘domestic violence’ having failed to get any traction on their boycott demands to prevent the Ad from airing at all.

Yet these same Progressives have no problems with politically motivated Progressives’ male-on-female violence as in this video:

Can you spell Self-Entitled Dictatorial Rulers of the World Agenda? lol

The glaring, and often blaring, Progressive hypocrisy is their downfall… but being the Arrogant Progressive/Socialist Self-Entitled Elitists that they are… it matters not to them what mere “little people” think. 😉

Gotta love that Progressive self-destruction thing!

Hey Barack? I triple dog dare you to hold the KSM trial in NYC!

You have to obey our decision not to do it, Socialist Boy!
Now shut up and do as you’re told!

His predictable Pavlovian reaction?
Cut off his nose to spite his face, of course


Additional Blogposts from VotingFemale:


Additional reading…

Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: Palin Exposes Misogyny In The Democratic Base, Again and Waiting For TPT From TOTUS

HOT AiR: AP misreports Tebow ad content and Cohen drops out of IL race; Update: Video added and Your tax dollars at work: the $2.5 million Census ad and Your tax dollars at work: the $2.5 million Census ad and Obamateurism of the Day and Quotes of the day and Horror: Gametime Tebow ad features domestic violence! Update: Prediction fulfilled


Heritage Foundry: The House and Senate Cloakroom: February 8 – 12, 2010 and Who Profits from the Death Tax? Estate Planning Lawyers. and Ahmadinejad Promises a Harsh Blow to “Global Arrogance” and Ahmadinejad Promises a Harsh Blow to “Global Arrogance” and Playing the Numbers Game With Terrorism and It Will Be as if the American Founding Never Happened

BigGovernment: Frances Fox Piven: Glenn Beck Seeks ‘Foreign, Dark-Skinned, Intellectual’ Scapegoats and Study: Net Neutrality Won’t Increase Jobs and Monday Open Thread: Internet Regulation Edition and You Betcha!… Palin Campaigns For Rick Perry– Writes “Hi Mom” On Her Hand and Palin’s 6 Words vs. Media’s Ignorance to the Real News and Commisioner Goodell, Is THIS Divisive? and Founding Bloggers Confirms Huffington Post’s Completely Worthless Observation

Hillbuzz: Is anyone up for driving the last Kennedy out of elected office? and What about a POLAR TEAM to help Palin? and Sarah Palin is too polarizing! and 5,000th Post at HillBuzz

Gateway Pundit: Iranian Supreme Leader “Very Optimistic” That Zionist Regime Will Soon Face Annihilation and He Won’t Listen… Obama Says KSM May Still Be Tried in NYC and You Betcha!… Palin Campaigns For Rick Perry– Writes “Hi Mom” On Her Hand! (Pics) and IRANIAN AMBASSADOR EGGED At Raucous Rally in Denmark – Protesters Arrested (Video) and Democrook Exits Race After Ex-Girlfriend & Massage Therapist Accuses Him of Abuse

Sister Toldjah: Obama theater will come alive during “bipartisan” healthcare reform “summit” and David Paterson to resign soon over alleged “new scandal”?

Nice Deb: Video: Senator Kit Bond Slams Obama Administration’s Loose Lips On Intelligence and Sarah’s Cheatin’ Hand and Video: Sarah Palin ‘Would Be Willing’ to Take On Obama in 2012′ and Video: Sarah Palin’s Keynote Address At The Tea Party Convention

Frugal Café: Now It’s “AfricaGate”: More IPCC Global Warming Errors & Junk Science… Add It to ClimateGate, GlacierGate, & AmazonGate and Mark Levin’s Scathing Opinion of Barack Obama’s Budget and Snowmageddon: Epic, Record-Breaking Snow Storm Buries NE US… Storm Not Over, More on Tuesday (video) – Updated

Talk Wisdom: Palin Speech Sets Off Lib Cranial Detonations and The Motions and Three Hours Of Obama Eligibility Discussion – on now!

Michelle Malkin: Colorado Springs Derangement Syndrome and Hand jive and Shady Dem drops out of Illinois lieutenant guv bid

Conservatives4Palin: C. Edmund Wright: Sarah Palin and the Tea Party Zeitgeist and Monday Open Thread

Boudica BPI: Nancy Pelosi exercise video.

Mad Conservative: From SmartGirlNation and Sarah’s not the only one to use crib notes and Quote of the day – Mark Steyn and Is the MSM paying attention… yet?

SamHenry’s Blog: The Saints Won! But, ah, I Have a Question… and Sarah Palin Mistreated by Liberal American Taliban and Pro Obama Blogs Mushrooming in 2010? Here’s One For his Teleprompter

Dancing Czars: Obama rallies glum Dems amid GOP woes? Those woes would be? and Andrew Breitbart at National Tea Party Convention to Media: “It’s Not Your Business Model That Sucks, It’s You That Sucks” and Palin to tea party: It’s revolution time

About VotingFemale

I am a female voter, as my blog name implies. I vote for conservatives. I am a political opponent of Leftists, Progressives, Socialists, Marxists, and Communists.
This entry was posted in Arrogant Progressives, Sexism, Super Bowl Ads and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

228 Responses to Progressives’ Political Tactics, Ego, and Superbowl Ads

  1. Foxwood says:

    “I wish I knew what Gore knows so I too could invest with abandon and be assured of many returns.”

    Is that greed, Rosey? I think it’s one of the 7 deadly sins! It’s also the engine that runs Capitalism…

    Are we making a Capitalist out of you?


  2. Foxwood says:

    OH NO!

    We’re heading toward Obamageddon!

  3. Foxwood says:

    Where is Al Gore?

    Where is Global Warming?

  4. rosehips says:

    omg vf. the end of that vid of the couric-palin interview was shocking! lol I actually turned my back on the screen for a split second for something and turned back and there is a football player? I replayed it and KAPOW! the gov gets body slammed? omg. is that funny.

    and my first response was going to be that I agree with Gov Palin. Alaska is the border we share with Russia and is a real national security nightmare I would imagine. The gov of AK needs to be prepared to coordinate with many agencies if there is ever a breach of the border. I totally agree with her there and feel that couric was being very condescending.

  5. Foxwood says:

    I’m heading into no mans land for a while… putting up another cellsite…

  6. VotingFemale says:

    “the gov gets body slammed? omg. is that funny.”

    and there you have folks 😉

    male on female violence in the name of Progressive/Socialism is funny funny stuff to bleeding heart liberals. lol

    Rosehips says

    …I actually turned my back on the screen for a split second for something and turned back and there is a football player? I replayed it and KAPOW! the gov gets body slammed? omg. is that funny.

  7. Foxwood says:

    Can we play dogpile on the liberal, VF?

  8. Foxwood says:

    Hey! I got service!

    It’ll be better when I get done…. 🙂

  9. VotingFemale says:

    And of course the Progressives don’t just stop with approving Politically Motivated male-on-female violence…

    not by a long shot…

    Enter Politically Motivated Progressives’ Orgy of Misogyny

    * TMZ – Sarah Palin’s Hand Gets Job Done‎
    * Democratic Underground – I say we call it the “Sarah Palin Hand Job”
    * DailyKos – Sunday Talks Liveblog–Sarah Palin Hand Job Edition

    And of course there are those bleeding heart tweets

  10. rosehips says:

    heehee it should have read: omg, is that funny?

    of course its not, if you have no sense of humor.

    as you well described it vf, my outrage was all “faux” and my disdain for football is half contrived too. I thought the body slam was a very creative way to divert controversy away from the blanketed message that the ad conveys.
    although the body slam may be in bad taste, whoever expects a super bowl ad to be in good taste, probably has had too many concussions in their lifetime.

  11. rosehips says:

    saw the hand job blog on foundingfemales about the “Hi Mom!” written on gov Palin’s hand. I thought that was really sweet.

  12. VotingFemale says:

    These Progressives are killing themselves politically with all this and Sarah is baiting them on…

    Pavlov was right…

    And, baiting vermin to go over their own self-created cliff is a good thing 😉

  13. VotingFemale says:

    it is an example of pathological hypocrisy dear…

    no one thing taken on its own merits tells the whole tale…

    collectively they do.

    Keep it up! I say. keep putting end before means

    it will destroy the Progressives and has already severely damaged them. that they deny that, is icing on the cake… go ahead! deny it, Progressives! make my day! lol

    rosehips says

    heehee it should have read: omg, is that funny?

    of course its not, if you have no sense of humor.

    as you well described it vf, my outrage was all “faux” and my disdain for football is half contrived too. I thought the body slam was a very creative way to divert controversy away from the blanketed message that the ad conveys.
    although the body slam may be in bad taste, whoever expects a super bowl ad to be in good taste, probably has had too many concussions in their lifetime.

  14. Foxwood says:

    “Orgy of Misogyny”

    That’s what I’m talking about! Dogpile on the liberal!

  15. VotingFemale says:

    and Rosehips, you are as I am… but one single voter, and a friend… my beef is not with you…

    just so you know

  16. VotingFemale says:

    give that boy a milk bone to gnaw on lol

    Foxwood says

    “Orgy of Misogyny”

    That’s what I’m talking about! Dogpile on the liberal!

  17. samhenry says:

    Goof morning comrades – I will let the type stand!

    Another spectacular blogpost, VF.

    Dogpile on the liberal? Can I be of assistance?

  18. rosehips says:

    vf, I try not to take offense when left-leaning, commie-loving, socialist-hugging, cloth-bag toting, soft-shoe treading, bottle-rinsing, can- crushing, fish-kissing, water-loving, hemp-hanging, homeless-feeding, hungry-loving progressives are disparaged here. Did I forget history revisionist, disabled-bashing and veiled racists?

  19. VotingFemale says:

    Good Morning SamHenry!

  20. VotingFemale says:

    shouldn’t Socialist Victimology pushing, Wealth Spreading, Hopey-Changey Chanting, First Amendment Attacking, Mao Quoting, Fidel Kissing, Chavez glorifying, Che tee shirt wearing all be in there somewhere? lol

    rosehips says

    vf, I try not to take offense when left-leaning, commie-loving, socialist-hugging, cloth-bag toting, soft-shoe treading, bottle-rinsing, can- crushing, fish-kissing, water-loving, hemp-hanging, homeless-feeding, hungry-loving progressives are disparaged here. Did I forget history revisionist, disabled-bashing and veiled racists?

  21. rosehips says:

    I knew I forgot somethings vf! lol!

  22. Foxwood says:

    “Dogpile on the liberal? Can I be of assistance?”

    Morning SanH!

    Bodies here. Bodies there. Bodies, bodies everywherer!

    The more the merrier! It’s an Orgy of Misogyny!

  23. rosehips says:

    and good morning SH!

  24. samhenry says:

    Today is cleaning day so I will be in and out. Wish I could clean the Oval Office. I hear there is a large dust bunny in there.

  25. rosehips says:

    and foxy, if you want an “orgy of misogyny”, you’ll have to go elsewhere. haha

  26. rosehips says:

    SH, I vaguely recall that I offered to be the first family’s maid back in the early days of Obama’s first year. They never responded to my offer. Perhaps next time my offer should be sent by conventional methods. lol

  27. rosehips says:

    Study links sugary soft drinks to pancreas cancer

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – People who drink two or more sweetened soft drinks a week have a much higher risk of pancreatic cancer, an unusual but deadly cancer, researchers reported on Monday.

    People who drank mostly fruit juice instead of sodas did not have the same risk, the study of 60,000 people in Singapore found.

    Sugar may be to blame but people who drink sweetened sodas regularly often have other poor health habits, said Mark Pereira of the University of Minnesota, who led the study.

    Writing in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, Pereira and colleagues said they followed 60,524 men and women in the Singapore Chinese Health Study for 14 years.

    Over that time, 140 of the volunteers developed pancreatic cancer. Those who drank two or more soft drinks a week had an 87 percent higher risk of being among those who got pancreatic cancer.

  28. LisaInTX says:

    Good post.
    IMO…People need to get a grip on this abortion/murder thing. Genocide of American future generations is WHAT it is about by the “Powers that be”…..That and to make Americans into a 3rd world country.
    This next census should prove the numbers of whites that have now moved onto the welfare line because THAT is the agenda of those who have “Their best Interest” at heart….not the people of this nation.

  29. samiam60 says:


    Strong words from a Strong Lady.

    I couldn’t agree with you more.

    History will record this era of Abortion on Demand as a Genocide.

    No two ways about it.

  30. Foxwood says:

    Good Morning Lisa!

    Rosey has already rained on my Orgy of Misogyny… 😦

  31. rosehips says:

    haha foxy, is there such a thing as an orgy of one?

  32. Foxwood says:

    We call it Mardi Gras!

  33. LisaInTX says:

    Thank you and I’m with ya on this.
    Everyone should watch that video of a real abortion! If that doesn’t change their minds, then they NO LONGER have compassion in their souls for the helpless and weak.
    Roe wasn’t even that girl’s REAL name NOR was she raped as they at first attempted to get her an abortion!
    It started out as a LIE and was PUSHED thru the courts and approved by an activist judge who clearly failed to remember the right of LIFE, LIBERTY and the Pursuit of happiness!

    In September 1969, while working as a carnival side-show barker, Norma L. McCorvey discovered she was pregnant. She returned to Dallas, where friends advised her to assert that she had been raped, because then she could obtain a legal abortion (with the understanding that Texas’s anti-abortion laws allowed abortion in the cases of rape and incest). However, this scheme failed, as there was no police report documenting the alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the site shuttered, closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. [5]

    In 1970, attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of Norma L. McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). At the time, McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape, but she later acknowledged she had lied earlier about having been raped.[6][7] The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. Although McCorvey was still hoping the courts would rule in her favor in time for her to end her unwanted pregnancy, she told her attorneys, “Let’s do it for other women.” [8]

    “Rape” is not mentioned anywhere in the court documents and was never a consideration in Roe v. Wade. [9] Norma McCorvey’s affidavit does not include the word “rape”

  34. VotingFemale says:

    Good Morning Lisa!

    and thank you dear!

    the first question on the FED census is:

    What is your phone number?

    Guess what my answer will be..


    LisaInTX says

    Good post.
    IMO…People need to get a grip on this abortion/murder thing. Genocide of American future generations is WHAT it is about by the “Powers that be”…..That and to make Americans into a 3rd world country.
    This next census should prove the numbers of whites that have now moved onto the welfare line because THAT is the agenda of those who have “Their best Interest” at heart….not the people of this nation.

  35. LisaInTX says:

    Norma L. McCorvey is a healthy Christian woman. In the present day, she is an activist who speaks out against legalized, willful abortion. She was once Jane Roe of Roe versus Wade, the court case that gave abortionists legitimacy to perform the monstrous act of abortion.

    “After over 28 years of guilt-induced drug binges and various jobs in abortion clinics in an attempt to justify her involvement in the legalization of abortion, Norma McCorvey did the unthinkable. As the former “poster-girl” for abortion who, in the words of a friend, “jumped off of the poster and into the arms of Christ,” Norma truly began to live her life over, and today seeks to tell the world the truth about abortion. (Roe v. Life, 2)

  36. AFVET says:

    Any odds out there for how long it will take for Obama to meltdown/throw a tantrum over Health Care ?
    What part of NO !!! does he not understand ???

  37. LisaInTX says:

    LOL—I plan on only telling them how many live here and then they can hit the road. I will not answer ANY racial comments—if pushed, I may say the unthinkable….hahahaha

  38. Foxwood says:

    Morning AFVET!

    He doesn’t like the word NO. I hope he hears it alot!

  39. LisaInTX says:

    I think the video of Teebow and his mom represents the strength and courage of a mother’s love for her unborn child. That is why the Ad shows her to be the stronger of the two.

  40. Foxwood says:

    Rush is repeating Rahm Emanuel again.

    Sarah says she knew he was only repeating it.

  41. LisaInTX says:

    Morning Fox and AFVET….

  42. VotingFemale says:

    Good Morning AFVET!

    …the Socialist Man-God is due some serious humility lessons… the harder he resists the more humbling the lessons.

    Fate and Karma has a way of dealing with blowhards like him. lol

    AFVET says

    Any odds out there for how long it will take for Obama to meltdown/throw a tantrum over Health Care ?
    What part of NO !!! does he not understand ???

  43. LisaInTX says:

    This is older, but just the fact they put this stuff in shows how corrupt those writing it are!

  44. rosehips says:

    hey lisa, yeah I see that. no doubt the mom is a tough gal. It sounds like she had a rough pregnancy. I just saw a movie about an arts movement in the 90’s. One of the drivers and inspirations was a woman who got pregnant and then got cancer and was told that having the baby would endanger her own life. She refused to abort, gave birth and died two weeks later. I think she and her child can be an inspiration to us all. Of course if the kid turned into an addict or something it would hard to be inspired by that.

  45. rosehips says:

    and foxy, I am so tickled that the governor is so understanding of Rush and his “repetition” of Rahm.

  46. Foxwood says:

    Lame Stream Media says “what Rush said was far worse”.

    HAHAHA! HOW? He repeated Emanuel. You guys are losers and your readership and viewership prove it!

  47. rosehips says:

    the first question on the FED census is:

    VF, I tried calling that number and the woman who picked up the phone didn’t speak English. Are you sure you don’t have an illegal cleaning lady??? lol

    VF said: What is your phone number?

    Guess what my answer will be..


  48. LisaInTX says:

    Did anyone else see the video clip where Nobama admits that there had been some ‘sneaky’ addins that he was not aware of that made his claims come across as false?
    I know it ran on Fox, maybe it was shown on Beck?

  49. VotingFemale says:

    A new and very interesting Poll… the Marist Poll which shows Obama’s Disapproval at 47% and Approval at 44%

    The Independents are still swelling as the force to be reckoned with; well worth the 4 page read:

    Click to access Complete%20February%208,%202010%20USA%20Poll%20Release%20and%20Tables.pdf

  50. VotingFemale says:


    No Habla

    rosehips says

    the first question on the FED census is:

    VF, I tried calling that number and the woman who picked up the phone didn’t speak English. Are you sure you don’t have an illegal cleaning lady??? lol

    VF said: What is your phone number?

    Guess what my answer will be..


  51. Foxwood says:

    Michael Moron is definitely a greenhouse gas emitter!

  52. Foxwood says:


    New errors in IPCC climate change report
    The United Nations panel on climate change is facing fresh criticism today as The Sunday Telegraph reveals new factual errors and poor sources of evidence in its influential report to government leaders.

    By Richard Gray and Ben Leach
    Published: 9:00PM GMT 06 Feb 2010
    HImalayan glaciers : New errors in IPCC climate change report

    Last month, the IPCC was forced to issue a humiliating retraction after it emerged statements about the melting of Himalayan glaciers were inaccurate Photo: ALAMY

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) report is supposed to be the world’s most authoritative scientific account of the scale of global warming.

    But this paper has discovered a series of new flaws in it including:

    They are the latest in a series of damaging revelations about the IPCC’s most recent report, published in 2007.

    Last month, the panel was forced to issue a humiliating retraction after it emerged statements about the melting of Himalayan glaciers were inaccurate.

    Last weekend, this paper revealed that the panel had based claims about disappearing mountain ice on anecdotal evidence in a student’s dissertation and an article in a mountaineering magazine.

    And on Friday, it emerged that the IPCC’s panel had wrongly reported that more than half of the Netherlands was below sea level because it had failed to check information supplied by a Dutch government agency.

    Researchers insist the errors are minor and do not impact on the overall conclusions about climate change.

    However, senior scientists are now expressing concern at the way the IPCC compiles its reports and have hit out at the panel’s use of so-called “grey literature” — evidence from sources that have not been subjected to scientific ­scrutiny.

    A new poll has revealed that public belief in climate change is weakening.The panel’s controversial chair, Rajendra Pachauri, pictured right, is facing pressure to resign over the affair.

    The IPCC attempted to counter growing criticism by releasing a statement insisting that authors who contribute to its 3,000-page report are required to “critically assess and review the quality and validity of each source” when they use material from unpublished or non-peer-reviewed sources. Drafts of the reports are checked by scientific reviewers before they are subjected to line-by-line approval by the 130 member countries of the IPCC.

    Despite these checks, a diagram used to demonstrate the potential for generating electricity from wave power has been found to contain numerous errors.

    The source of information for the diagram was cited as the website of UK-based wave-energy company Wavegen. Yet the diagram on Wavegen’s website contains dramatically different figures for energy potential off Britain and Alaska and in the Bering Sea.

    When contacted by The Sunday Telegraph, Wavegen insisted that the diagram on its website had not been changed. It added that it was not the original source of the data and had simply reproduced it on its website.

    The diagram is widely cited in other literature as having come from a paper on wave energy produced by the Institute of Mechanical Engineering in 1991 along with data from the European Directory of Renewable Energy.

    Experts claim that, had the IPCC checked the citation properly, it would have spotted the discrepancies.

    It can also be revealed that claims made by the IPCC about the effects of global warming, and suggestions about ways it could be avoided, were partly based on information from ten dissertations by Masters students.

    One unpublished dissertation was used to support the claim that sea-level rise could impact on people living in the Nile delta and other African coastal areas, although the main focus of the thesis, by a student at the Al-Azhar University in Cairo, appears to have been the impact of computer software on environmental development.

    The IPCC also made use of a report by US conservation group Defenders of Wildlife to state that salmon in US streams have been affected by rising temperatures. The panel has already come under fire for using information in reports by conservation charity the WWF.

    Estimates of carbon-dioxide emissions from nuclear power stations and claims that suggested they were cheaper than coal or gas power stations were also taken from the website of the World Nuclear Association, rather than using independent scientific calculations.

    Such revelations are creating growing public confusion over climate change. A poll by Ipsos on behalf of environmental consultancy firm Euro RSCG revealed that the proportion of the public who believe in the reality of climate change has dropped from 44 per cent to 31per cent in the past year.

    The proportion of people who believe that climate change is a bit over-exaggerated rose from 22 per cent to 31per cent.

    Climate scientists have expressed frustration with the IPCC’s use of unreliable evidence.

    Alan Thorpe, chief executive of the Natural Environment Research Council, the biggest funder of climate science in the UK, said: “We should only be dealing with peer-reviewed literature. We open ourselves up to trouble if we start getting into hearsay and grey literature. We have enough research that has been peer-reviewed to provide evidence for climate change, so it is concerning that the IPCC has strayed from that.”

    Professor Bob Watson, who chaired the IPCC before Dr Pachauri and is now chief scientist at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, insisted that despite the errors there was little doubt that human-induced climate change was a reality.

    But he called for changes in the way the IPCC compiles future reports.

    “It is concerning that these mistakes have appeared in the IPCC report, but there is no doubt the earth’s climate is changing and the only way we can explain those changes is primarily human activity,” he said.

    Mr Watson said that Dr Pachauri “cannot be personally blamed for one or two incorrect sentences in the IPCC report”, but stressed that the chairman must take responsibility for correcting errors.

    Another row over the IPCC report emerged last night after Professor Roger Pielke Jnr, from Colorado University’s Centre for Science and Technology Policy Research, claimed its authors deliberately ignored a paper he wrote that contradicted the panel’s claims about the cost of climate-related natural disasters.

    A document included a statement from an anonymous IPCC author saying that they believed Dr Pielke had changed his mind on the matter, when he had not.

  53. Foxwood says:

    Obutthole wants Hilary for his running mate in 2012!

  54. samiam60 says:

    foxwood says
    Obutthole wants Hilary for his running mate in 2012!


    Only because he desperately needs her voter base.

  55. Foxwood says:

    Guess where he wants to put Biden?

    The Supreme Court!


  56. Foxwood says:

    He’s already the court jester!


  57. arlenearmy says:

    John Murtha is dead

  58. Foxwood says:

    I’ll bite my tongue, Arlene!

  59. Pingback: Obligatory List of Best, Worst, Notable Super Bowl XLIV Commercials (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone

  60. samiam60 says:

    Planned Parenthood Pushes Intensive Sex Education for Kids as Young as 10

  61. samiam60 says:

    A new report by the International Planned Parenthood Federation is advocating that children as young as 10 be given extensive sex education, including an awareness of sex’s pleasures.

    The report, “Stand and Deliver,” charges that religious groups, specifically Catholics and Muslims, deny their young access to comprehensive sexual programs and education.

    “Young people’s sexuality is still contentious for many religious institutions. Fundamentalist and other religious groups — the Catholic Church and madrasas (Islamic Schools) for example — have imposed tremendous barriers that prevent young people, particularly, from obtaining information and services related to sex and reproduction. Currently, many religious teachings deny the pleasurable and positive aspects of sex.” the report states.

    Click here to read the report.

    The report demands that children 10 and older be given a “comprehensive sexuality education” by governments, aid organizations and other groups, and that young people should be seen as “sexual beings.”

    “Young people have the right to be informed about sexuality and to have access to contraceptives and other services,” Bert Koenders, the Netherlands Minister for Development Cooperation, wrote in the foreword to the report. It was his organization that helped fund the report.

    The report argues that sex education should be “recast” to show sexuality as a “positive force for change and development, as a source of pleasure, an embodiment of human rights and an expression of self.”

    Much like a U.N. report released last August that advocated teaching masturbation to children as young as 5, “Stand and Deliver” has set off a wave of protest among religious and conservative groups.

    Ed Mechmann, spokesman for New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, charged that Planned Parenthood was “trying to teach children sex without values and that sex is a matter of pleasure and done without consequences.”

    He said religions like Catholicism and Islam teach sex as part of a much bigger picture and that Planned Parenthood was trying to de-link sex from traditional values.

    “It is part of an effort to get children to reject traditional values and accept a liberal American-European view,” he said. “In many traditional countries — Catholic and Muslim — it won’t work and should be seen as cultural imperialism.”

    Mechmann also charged that Planned Parenthood’s report was compromised because it has a financial stake advocating the changes. “The difference between Planned Parenthood and us is that we don’t make money off what we teach and say. They do. They make money off contraceptives and abortions,” he said.

    Michelle Turner, president of the Maryland-based Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, said Planned Parenthood was simply trying to eliminate parental say.

    “What are they trying to do? They are trying to eliminate the role of mom and dad in the family,” Turner said. “For Planned Parenthood to decide that governments, private organizations and religious organizations should make decisions about kids’ sexuality is just going too far.”

    “It is part of a bigger push to change the way we think about sex,” she said. That sex is all about pleasure and there are no consequences. They are wrong. No matter how much we teach children, some will make mistakes. They will forget. And Planned Parenthood doesn’t want to deal with that,” she said.

    “They see religious groups, especially those that counsel abstinence and waiting until marriage, as bad guys,” she added. “We aren’t.”

    Planned Parenthood said it was unable to comment because the report was issued by its European office and it was unable to contact them.,2933,585108,00.html

  62. Foxwood says:

    I wonder which Republican will take Mutha’s… er.. the people’s seat?

  63. samhenry says:

    Hello and good bye, troops. I agree with most of what you have all said.

  64. samiam60 says:

    The people who gave us Climate Gate are now introducing Climate Care. A new Government Run Agency.

  65. rosehips says:

    foxy, just a reminder. Behind every climate change skeptic are self-serving corporate interests who are willing to pay significant coin to any who will discredit the overwhelming scientific opinion that points to human caused climate change.

    Think-tanks take oil money and use it to fund climate deniers

    ExxonMobil cash supported concerted campaign to undermine case for man-made warming

    By Jonathan Owen and Paul Bignell
    An orchestrated campaign is being waged against climate change science to undermine public acceptance of man-made global warming, environment experts claimed last night.

    The attack against scientists supportive of the idea of man-made climate change has grown in ferocity since the leak of thousands of documents on the subject from the University of East Anglia (UEA) on the eve of the Copenhagen climate summit last December.

    Free-market, anti-climate change think-tanks such as the Atlas Economic Research Foundation in the US and the International Policy Network in the UK have received grants totalling hundreds of thousands of pounds from the multinational energy company ExxonMobil. Both organisations have funded international seminars pulling together climate change deniers from across the globe.

    Many of these critics have broadcast material from the leaked UEA emails to undermine climate change predictions and to highlight errors in claims that the Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035. Professor Phil Jones, who has temporarily stood down as director of UEA’s climactic research unit, is reported in today’s Sunday Times to have “several times” considered suicide. He also drew parallels between his case and that of Dr David Kelly, found dead in the wake of the row over the alleged “sexing up” of intelligence in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. Professor Jones said he was taking sleeping pills and beta-blockers and had received two death threats in the past week alone.

    Climate sceptic bloggers broadcast stories last week casting doubts on scientific data predicting dramatic loss of the Amazon rainforest. All three stories, picked up by mainstream media, questioned the credibility of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the way it does its work. A new attack on climate science, already dubbed “Seagate” by sceptics, relating to claims that more than half the Netherlands is in danger of being submerged under rising sea levels, is likely to be at the centre of the newest skirmish in coming weeks.
    A complicated web of relationships revolves around a number of right-wing think-tanks around the world that dispute the threats of climate change. ExxonMobil is a key player behind the scenes, having donated hundreds of thousands of dollars in the past few years to climate change sceptics. The Atlas Foundation, created by the late Sir Anthony Fisher (founder of the Institute of Economic Affairs), received more than $100,000 in 2008 from ExxonMobil, according to the oil company’s reports.

    Atlas has supported more than 30 other foreign think-tanks that espouse climate change scepticism, and co-sponsored a meeting of the world’s leading climate sceptics in New York last March. Called “Global Warming: Was It Ever Really a Crisis?”, it was organised by the Heartland Institute – a group that described the event as “the world’s largest-ever gathering of global warming sceptics”. The organisation is another right-wing think-tank to have benefited from funding given by ExxonMobil in recent years.

  66. arlenearmy says:


    Im also wondering whose gonna take Murtha’s place. You know, Rendell is governor & a democrat. I dont know if he appoints a replacement or if there will be a special election?

    Of course nobody knows the future, I wonder about Byrd’s medical condition. What’s going to happen if he dies?

  67. Foxwood says:

    There are too many scandals Rose. It’s a big FAT lie.

  68. Foxwood says:

    India just said FU!

  69. Foxwood says:

    India is not a Corporation.

    Besides, Rose. CO2 is NOT pollution.

  70. Foxwood says:

    They’ll bring in his corpse and raise his hand to vote, Arlene! 🙂

  71. Foxwood says:

    Rose? Your going to tell me that even when they said they lied, your not going to believe it? They have admitted to it and you don’t believe it. I call it brainwashed.

  72. Foxwood says:

    See Rosey, Your getting your info from the Lame Stream Media… Why would the UK lie?

    ALERT! More fraud uncovered in climategate scandal
    February 6, 2:19 PMConservative ExaminerAnthony G. Martin
    Previous Next
    21 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

    Get alerts when there is a new article from the Conservative Examiner. Read’s terms of use.
    Email Address

    Include other special offers from
    Terms of Use

    Three months after the shocking revelation came to light that top climate scientists had manipulated data to arrive at their erroneous conclusions concerning ‘man-made global warming,’ the media in the United States has still yet to report a single word about the scandal.
    (The statue of Andrew Jackson is seen in Lafayette Park, across from the White House in Washington, Saturday, Feb. 6, 2010, as a blizzard hit the nation’s capital and much of the Mid Atlantic region. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)).

    Newspapers in the U.K., however, have been all over the story, engaging in relentless investigative journalism that once could be found on this side of the pond. And now that those papers have essentially blown to bits the theory of man-made global warming, one Canadian newspaper proclaimed today the following headline–‘The Great Global Warming Collapse.’

    The writer provides the following telling quote:

    “The global warming movement as we have known it is dead,” the brilliant analyst Walter Russell Mead says in his blog on The American Interest. It was done in by a combination of bad science and bad politics.

    Not only has it been discovered that some climate scientists cooked the books to promote a personal political agenda but it is safe to say that it has also been discovered the motivation behind the scandal. As the article cited above reports, it’s all about grants:

    Mr. Pachauri’s own Energy and Resources Unit, based in New Delhi, has collected millions in grants to study the effects of glacial melting – all on the strength of that bogus glacier claim, which happens to have been endorsed by the same scientist who now runs the unit that got the money. Even so, the IPCC chief is hanging tough. He insists the attacks on him are being orchestrated by companies facing lower profits.

    Mr. Pachauri, of course, is the head of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Further, writing in Front Page Magazine Dr. Walter E. Williams, professor of economics at George Mason University, quotes the founder of The Weather Channel, John Coleman, as saying that not only did certain climate scientists and the IPCC manipulate data on the weather, but so did the National Climate Data Center, which is part of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Coleman exposes the shocking fraud in a five-part documentary on this latest revelation concerning the scandal. Dr. Williams states,

    The Coleman documentary presents research by computer expert E. Michael Smith and Certified Consulting Meteorologist Joseph D’Aleo. During the 1960s and into the 1980s, the number of stations used for calculating global surface temperatures was about 6,000. By 1990, the number of stations dropped rapidly to about 1,500. Most of the stations lost were in the colder regions of the Earth. Not adjusting for their lost made temperatures appear to be higher than was in fact the case. According to Science & Environmental Policy Project, Russia reported that CRU was ignoring data from colder regions of Russia, even though these stations were still reporting data. That means data loss was not simply the result of station closings but deliberate decisions by CRU to ignore them in order to hype their global warming claims. D’Aleo and Smith report that our NCDC engaged in similar deceptive activity where they have dropped stations, particularly in colder climates, higher elevations or closer to the polar regions. Temperatures are now simply projected for these colder stations from other stations, usually in warmer climates.

    Thus, no data was received from colder climates. The effect was a drastically skewed picture of average global temperatures due to lack of data from cold regions and an overabundance of data from warmer regions.

    Dr. Williams also ventures the irrefutable observation that the motive for perpetrating such fraud is the ‘trillions of dollars and social control that is at stake’ for the vested political and economic interests.

    It’s all about the money and the social control.

  73. Foxwood says:

    If you believe CO2 is pollution, it’s your duty to abort yourself.

  74. Foxwood says:

    You can believe it and wish it. It’s all a lie. Believe your lies, but you must abort yourself if you truly believe the CO2 you emit is pollution.

  75. Foxwood says:

    All of the info is there for you to use your brain and figure out. When we were warming, it is documented that the moon, mars, neptune and venus were warming. Did we pollute that much?

    You have to use a brain to answer the question….

  76. samhenry says:

    Now my FOX, remember we get mad at people who say unkind things about the brain power of Sarah Palin, LOL

    How are you the day after the big win anyway?

  77. Foxwood says:

    Still recovering, SamH! I shouldn’t of drank that much on a work night. BLA!

  78. Foxwood says:

    BTW, Working on a Comparison of brains in Sarah and Obutthole. Should PO alot of libbies.

  79. Foxwood says:

    My bird in the coalmine is Rosey… If it POs her, I know I hit the mark.

  80. samhenry says:

    I love it and so will Rosie , your “canary in the coal mine” – she is quite some “bird” as the Brits used to term a hot chick.

  81. samhenry says:

    And I’m the canary in the coal mine when it comes to smiley faces. LOL

    If you love them so much, then I’ll meet you under the racks at WalMart and we can have a hair of the dog and discuss them.

  82. Foxwood says:

    “just a reminder. Behind every climate change skeptic are self-serving corporate interests who are willing to pay significant coin to any who will discredit the overwhelming scientific opinion that points to human caused climate change.”

    How do you ecplaind the two most used centers to explain Global Warming have admitted to lying? The IPCC and CRU have been caught in lies or admitted to lying. That makes any data you can come up with a lie also. Do you still want to use lying data?

    Again, I say one must use a brain to deduce the truth, and that truth is Global Warming is a lie designed to get taxes from underdeveloped brained people.

  83. Foxwood says:

    Bring on any pro GW article. The data is flawed by the IPCCs and CRUs admission.

  84. Foxwood says:

    Wal-mart will be the job I have when I retire!


  85. Foxwood says:

    Another round of Global Warming to hit again tomorrow. It’s a mystery to me. I guess it would be colder if we didn’t have this Global Warming to save us.

  86. rosehips says:

    I’m getting my info from where foxy? haha check my citation…why would the UK lie? indeed!

    foxy said: See Rosey, Your getting your info from the Lame Stream Media… Why would the UK lie?

  87. samiam60 says:

    An overwhelming majority of American voters agree on at least one thing — the Founding Fathers would be unhappy with the way things are going in Washington these days. So says a whopping 84 percent of voters, including a large majorities of Democrats (77 percent), Republicans (92 percent) and independents (81 percent).

  88. Foxwood says:


    Global Warming Theory Sidelined
    By MikeGruber

    Discredited climate theories make strange bedfellows. In his State of the Union address last week, President Obama said there was “overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change.” In his most recent message to the world, Osama bin Laden said that climate change “is not an intellectual luxury but an actual fact.” It’s nice to see these two leaders can agree on something.

    The hitch is that the man-caused catastrophic global warming theory is dead, and it needs to be buried. Evidence had been mounting for years that there were problems with the global warming model; most telling was that the globe refused to warm up. Carbon emissions continued apace, but the world began cooling. This is why true believers abandoned the “global warming” brand name and tried to shift the debate to the more ambiguous label “climate change,” which is something the rest of us like to refer to as “weather.”

    The dam broke with Climategate when hacked e-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit revealed that global warming advocates had for years attempted to hide conflicting data and silence their professional critics. British authorities have determined that the university broke freedom-of-information laws by denying information to scientists seeking to check claims that global warming was caused by human activity.

    Evidence is emerging that the data had been rigged all along. Russian analysts noted that British temperature calculations excluded data from 40 percent of Russian territory, much of which showed no increase in temperature in the past 50 years. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration also cherry-picked data, cutting Canadian data sources from 600 to 35 and relying on only one monitor for all of Canada above the Arctic Circle. This was done even though Canada operates 1,400 weather stations, 100 of which are in the Arctic.

    The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is having its own scandal regarding a finding in its Nobel Peace Prize-winning 2007 report that glaciers in India were rapidly disappearing. It is now revealed that this dramatic claim was based not on years of patient observation and research but anecdotes from a hiking magazine and a student’s master’s thesis. IPCC Chairman Rajendra K. Pachauri knew about the erroneous information before December’s Copenhagen climate summit but maintained the falsehood. He even denounced a report from India that showed the glaciers were in far less jeopardy as “unsubstantiated research.” Last month, Mr. Pachauri published a sexually explicit novel, further diminishing his professional reputation.

    Climate scientists have to come to grips with some highly inconvenient truths. World temperatures continue to decline as carbon emissions increase. Chilly Scotland is facing its coldest winter in a century. Arctic sea ice is not vanishing. Polar bears are experiencing a baby boom. Water vapor appears to play as important a role in the climate as carbon emissions. Sunspot activity may be more important than both combined. Meanwhile, climate change fanatics seek to blame capitalism and productivity for global warming, global cooling, too much snow, not enough snow, hurricanes, tornadoes and even the Haiti earthquake.

    The simplistic and increasingly discredited theory of carbon-based, man-caused global warming needs to be discarded, and the scientists who sought to squelch skeptics and artificially inflate their own reputations must be disciplined. Alas, Mr. Obama and Mr. bin Laden need to update their talking points.

  89. Foxwood says:

    Who are those Corporations?

  90. samiam60 says:

    I am wondering if Edwards and Gore will team up for a run in 2012.

  91. Foxwood says:

    I would never dare to rely on a lie. 🙂

  92. samhenry says:

    Rosie – the UK lies because they are silly about everything. Those climate statistics are in the care of the same nabob who is in charge at the Ministry of Silly Walks.

    No one is serious anymore. They are nervously laughing after every pronouncement followed quickly by “I didn’t mean it THAT way” followed by a quick trip to the bathroom to snigger in private. Why do you think the Brits have a stiff upper lip? It’s from always trying to keep their mouths shut about their faulty statistics – and their Faulty Towers, LOL

  93. Foxwood says:

    You would use lying data, Rose?


  94. Foxwood says:

    Sounds like something Obutthole would do.

  95. rosehips says:

    foxy, and can you say where your info comes from that they are the two most used centers to explain Global warming?

    foxy, flaws in scientific studies are unfortunate but happen all the time. I don’t think you are a scientist and if you were I’m sure you wouldn’t imply that because two studies have been discredited that all other studies that show that humans contribute to climate change should be automatically dismissed? But perhaps I misunderstand. Are you saying that because these two studies are flawed that all other studies with similar conclusions are therefore flawed?

    foxy said: How do you ecplaind the two most used centers to explain Global Warming have admitted to lying?

  96. Foxwood says:

    Did you miss the part Rosey, that they admit to lying?

  97. Foxwood says:



    They are lying!

    Your showing improvement…

  98. samhenry says:

    I say the only way to end this thing will be for me to take Rose and FOX to the top of the leaning tower of Pisa, drop them both off and see which one makes it to earth faster, laden with lies.

  99. Foxwood says:

    Ok SamH…

    If Rosey get’s to jump first…


  100. rosehips says:

    foxy, soooo, the glaciers aren’t melting because why?

  101. Foxwood says:

    Who cares? They aren’t melting…

  102. samiam60 says:

    It is a proven scientific FACT people that Global Warming is very very REAL!

    It begins at dawn when humans get up and ends at dusk when humans go to sleep.

    Therefore humans are too blame. GOT IT!

  103. Foxwood says:

    Then we better stop that then!



  104. samiam60 says:

    How dare anyone say Al Gore lied! That just can’t be! It must be true. I put an ice cube in my drink and it melted faster than usual. Case in point, the warmth of my human hand warmed the glass thus causing my glass to warm which in turn created a sort of test tube Climate Change. WERE ALL GOING TO DIE! Run Foxwood, Rose was right!

  105. Foxwood says:


  106. rosehips says:

    whatever. I envy all you deniers who can drive by a gas station and not think about how much fossil fuel is burned each day across the globe and not wonder how all that burning couldn’t produce some negative affect on the climate. What I don’t envy is the day you have to tell your grandchildren and their kids that you were a denier. I hate to think of that look your little bundle of joy will give you when you admit that your generation could have done something to slow the change down, but that you instead chose to ignore overwhelming evidence and instead pounced on every possible explanation as to why over 99% of scientists were wrong.

  107. Foxwood says:

    Why think about a lie?

  108. samhenry says:

    I don’t listen to anyone about climate change anymore. They still don’t quite now why dinosaurs died although they have a few theories. Mine is that they just couldn’t fit into a car wash. I used to ride one to work.

    We still haven’t dug up that ancestor that ultimately links us to the slime but they are getting there every time Nancy Pelosi opens her mouth.

    Theories need to be tested – to be proved. How can you test millions of years of change – even from layers of rock.

  109. Foxwood says:

    99% is a made up number Rose…

  110. Foxwood says:

    Are you promoting Opinion as fact again?

  111. samhenry says:

    FOX – I hope that slew of smilies weren’t directed at me.

    E=Mc squared;

    Smiley=SH flared!

  112. samhenry says:

    99% is not a made up number, FOX. Ivory soap was always 99/100th percent pure – just like me I’ll have you know – at least after my Saturday night bath.

  113. Foxwood says:

    I’ll ask again, Rose, When there was global warming and the moon, mars, neptune and venus were warming, did we pollute so much that it affected them?

    I know it’s hard, but you have to use a brain to answer this one…

  114. Foxwood says:

    Ok… I admit there is such a number…

    The Arabs had something to do with that.

  115. samhenry says:

    Glacial melting – well Rose – my theory is that the glaciers may be a cyclical thing OR we are destined to have a hot planet no matter what anyone does. I think the sun and its flares have something to do with it. The sun and I don’t like smiley faces.

    There used to be a tropical rain forest in Michigan but it is not there now I’ve heard.

  116. samhenry says:

    Rose – bringing up the rear is what I have always done. I think just from a pollution standpoint that we should be off the oil products.

    I think that for the sake of conservation, we should be regulating how much water is used in Florida. I couldn’t drive to see my cousin in Orlando because the road was littered with them.

  117. samhenry says:

    Rose – the big problem is that there are just too many of us – even here on the blog LOL.

    I am a big fan of the pill. It prevents the kill.

  118. samhenry says:

    Rose, you have broken the heart of an ole dawg. You have called me a denier. I only learned what one was a few months ago and now I are one.LOL I will have to go make my humble meal on a plastic tray in the micro. Now that is something I really abhor – all the plastic. I actually had a student boarder who laughed at my recycling. OY. Anyway time to turn on CNN for another point of view and then ping some posts off of it. I love a parade and I love a charade! LOL

  119. VotingFemale says:


  120. VotingFemale says:

    The GOP Should Fall in line and in memory of Ted Kennedy John Murtha, vote for ObamaCare. lol

    The White House Flag is at 1/4-mast… 1/4 for Teddy, 1/4 for Murtha, and 1/4 for ObamaCare.

    Should ObamaCare be given Freedom of Speech? If a corporation qualifies for freedom of speech, why not a House Bill/Senate Bill?

    Time for a Constitutional Amendment, I tell you. hahahaha

  121. VotingFemale says:

    Save California, hunting down and killing every last buzz buzz buzzing insect on California’s Endangered Species List would save billions of taxpayer dollars.

  122. tellitlikeitis says:

    Good evening everyone! Congrats to New Orleans. Great game!
    Check this out!

    A different kind of President from the current one!! Pass this on.

    George W. Bush heard about Fort Hood, got in his car without any escort, apparently they did not have time to react, and drove to Fort Hood. He was stopped at the gate and the guard could not believe who he had just stopped. Bush only ask for directions to the hospital then drove on. The gate guard called that “The president Is on Fort Hood and driving to the hospital.” The base went bananas looking for Obama. When they found it was Bush they immediately offered escort and Bush simply told them to shut up and let him visit the wounded and the dependents of the dead. He stayed at Fort Hood for over six hours and was finally asked to leave by a message from the White House. Obama flew in days later and held a “photo ” session in a gym and did not even go to the hospital. All this I picked up from two soldiers here who happened to be at Fort Hood when it happened.

  123. tellitlikeitis says:

    The original article can be found at

    Written by Dr. Paul L. Williams

    “In my own life in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this
    country that
    has given me so much,” she said. “See, that’s why I left a job at a big
    law firm for
    a career in public service, “…
    Michelle Obama

    No, Michele Obama does not get paid to serve as the First Lady and she
    perform any official duties. But this hasn’t deterred her from hiring an
    unprecedented number of staffers to cater to her every whim and to satisfy
    her every
    request in the midst of the Great Recession.

    Just think, Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing china for the
    White House
    during the Civil War. And Mamie Eisenhower had to shell out the salary for
    personal secretary from her husband’s salary.

    Total Personal Staff members for other first ladies paid by taxpayers:

    Mamie Eisenhower: One– paid for personally
    out of
    President’s salary.
    Jackie Kennedy: One
    Roseline Carter: One
    Barbara Bush: One
    Hilary Clinton: Three
    Laura Bush: One
    Michele Obama: Twenty-two

    How things have changed! If you’re one of the tens of millions of
    Americans facing
    certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the
    shelves at
    Wal-Mart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers,prepare to scream and then
    come to
    realize that the benefit package for these servants of Ms Michelle are
    the same as
    members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for
    assorted lackeys is paid by YOU, John Q. Public:

    Michele Obama’s personal staff:

    One.. $172,200 – Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
    Two.. $140,000 – Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and
    Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)
    Three.. $113,000 – Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the
    President and
    White House Social Secretary for Mrs. Obama)
    Four.. $102,000 – Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the
    and Director of Communications for the First Lady)
    Five.. $100,000 – Winter, Melissa (Special Assistant to the President
    Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
    Six.. $90,000 Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the
    First Lady)
    Seven.. $84,000 – Lilyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press
    Secretary to the
    First Lady)
    Eight.. $75,000 – Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and
    Advance for
    the First Lady)
    Nine.. $70,000 – Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and
    Project for
    the First Lady)
    Ten.. $65,000 – Burnough, Erinn (Deputy Director and Deputy Social
    Eleven.. $64,000 – Reinstein, Joseph B.(Deputy Director and Deputy
    Social Secretary)
    Twelve.. $62,000 – Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling
    Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
    Thirteen.. $60,000 Fitz, Alan O.(Deputy Director of Advance and Trip
    for the First Lady)
    Fourteen.. $57,500 – Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide
    to the
    First Lady)
    Fifteen… $52,500 – Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and
    Deputy Press
    Secretary To The First Lady)
    Sixteen.. $50,000 – Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for
    Scheduling and
    Traveling Aide To The First Lady)
    Seventeen.. $45,000 – Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of
    For The First Lady)
    Eighteen.. $43,000 – Tubman, Samanth a (Deputy Associate Director, Social
    Nineteen.. $40,000 – Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief
    Of Staff
    to the First Lady)
    Twenty.. $36,000 – Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social
    Twenty-One.. $35,000 – Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
    Twenty-Two.. $35,000 – Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of
    Correspondence for the First Lady)
    (total $1,591,200 in annual salaries)

    There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created
    such an
    army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First
    Lady’s social

    One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense.
    Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and
    Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One
    to Europe
    Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com

    Yes, I know, The Canadian Free Press had to publish this, perhaps because
    no longer has a free press and the USA media is too scared that they
    might be
    considered racist or suffer at the hands of Obama.

    Sorry America !

  124. tellitlikeitis says:

    My dedication to Murtha. King of pork.

  125. tellitlikeitis says:

    Damn computer. I’ll try again. lol
    Here ya go John Murhta.

  126. samhenry says:

    Hi Tellit. Sorry about the Colts.

    I am sick that George Bush was asked to leave Ft. Hood by the abominalobama or should that be abnormalobama

  127. samiam60 says:

    Why do the Pro-Choice people get upset with women who choose Life?

  128. samhenry says:

    Because the want to have it all, Sami. I used to be pro-choice and now I am less so. I believe it should be limited to rape, incest and the health of the mother. HOWEVER – it must be done within hours of the event.

    I was never a fan of NOW. Gloria Steinem was interesting but they are all so rigid. Perhaps in those days one had to be fierce and rigid in order to counter whatever male reaction was there. Who knows. I think you can use your brain and debating skills to more effect that a million organizations. They don’t like Sarah Palin because they can’t be like her. They don’t recognize anything of themselves in her. They do not realize that in placing her outside of their experience they are committing political suicide.

  129. samiam60 says:

    Guess they aren’t really Pro-Choice then after all.

  130. tellitlikeitis says:

    Hello friends. I am sorry about the Colts too. New Orleans played a good game and I congratulate them. Better luck for the Colts next year.

  131. arlenearmy says:

    what happened to Bush? You say that Ft. Hood asked him to leave. I have not heard this before. Clue me in.

  132. arlenearmy says:

    My previous question was directed at Sam Henry

  133. arlenearmy says:

    The reason why some ANTI-life women (such as NOW get mouthy when it comes to bashing anti-abortion folks is that they are afraid that females will be forced to accept mother-hood. They see pregnancy as a punishment, diminished capacity to job promotions, & as a form of slavery, etc..

    They also see abortions as a way out of responsibilities of raising a child.

    They are failing to recognize what we all can not change (our biology). Women get pregnant & men don’t.

    There was a time when abortions were illegal, except for saving life of the mother. Then they made it legal for any woman up to certain amount of months.

    Then the idea came up that the government could offer to sterilize these low income females & give these females some money. But this was too controversial, so the project got scrapped.

    Then a bunch of low income females (mostly blacks & hispanics) wanted abortions at tax dollar expense. That is when abortions were seen as a form of birth control.

    One of these days , we are gonna find a bunch of females not being able to get pregnant because somebodies (powers-that-be behind the scene) have sterilized them. Have you noticed that young girls are having menstrual periods at a VERY early age. Somebodies on the down-low is playing God.

  134. samhenry says:

    You expressed an answer to Sami’s question best. You filled in the blanks from my statement “they want to have it all.” Good to see you, A. And good to touch base with your wisdom.

  135. samiam60 says:

    Good Morning Arlene and SamH. Thank you for helping me understand a very difficult issue.
    There are two sides to every coin.

  136. samiam60 says:

    Good Morning my Fellow Patriots 🙂

  137. VotingFemale says:

    Good Morning Sammy! and Everyone!

  138. samiam60 says:

    The latest Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll makes even worse reading for President Obama. According to Rasmussen, just 26 percent of American voters strongly approve of Obama’s job performance, with 41 percent strongly disapproving, for a Presidential Approval Index rating of -15.

  139. Foxwood says:

    It’s a good day to be a subject of the Dictatorship!
    Sieg Heil und Guten Morgan fellow unAmerican Nazis!
    It’s time to unfurl the Confederate Swastika and fire the cannon!

  140. Foxwood says:

    Be alert. We are still under a National Emergency.

    Besides, we need more lerts…

  141. VotingFemale says:

    Good Morning Foxwood!

  142. samiam60 says:

    Good Morning VF and Foxwood.

    How much lower can the Obama poll numbers go?

    How about ZERO

  143. Foxwood says:

    Morning VF, Sami!

    I’ve heard there are numbers below zero!

  144. rosehips says:

    morning peeps!

    foxy, what a revelation! So you’ve discovered fractions and decimals? woohoo!

    foxy said: I’ve heard there are numbers below zero!

  145. Foxwood says:

    I’ve also heard global warming makes numbers below zero…

    hee hee hee!

  146. rosehips says:

    just a few comments about some of the recent discussion.

    re: human-caused climate change. guess what peeps? climate is not static! It changes naturally and reacts to natural occurances like volcanos. It is a dynamic system. I am no climatologist but it doesn’t take one to realize that outside variables can have an effect if significant enough. Yes the planet warms and cools without human intervention but is it at all possible that our actions can have a negative effect?

    re: choice. Sami, where have you read womens’ reactions to choosing life that expressed upset that the choice was life? I would love to read that.
    It’s easy to explain why a woman chooses an abortion. She doesn’t want the responsibility. She wants it all. But there are as many reasons for aborting as there are reasons for not. Some say its selfish. Some think its courageous. It doesn’t cost anything to be critical of the woman who chooses not to produce another life on this planet. Talk and condemnation are cheap.

    tellit, I am sorry you get so charged up over the death of those you oppose politically. And that story about Bush at Ft. Hood? You should really hold judgement until you know all the facts. There could have been some serious security issues with Bush being there. He just showed up? Well, I’m sorry but what was it he was trying to accomplish? I’m sure the victims of the attack were thrilled to see him, but was it really the time to visit the wounded???
    and the comparison of the first lady’s aides is probably exagerated. Are we to believe that none of the other first lady’s had dual assistants with their husbands like Michelle does? I’m not saying that Michelle doesn’t have more help than the others, but I doubt if the comparisons are fair.

  147. rosehips says:

    morning foxy!

  148. rosehips says:

    DRILL, BABY, KILL! lol

  149. Foxwood says:

    Climate Crap is a lie.


  150. Foxwood says:

    Proven to be a lie.


  151. Foxwood says:

    They admitted to lying.

    Why can’t you live with it?

  152. rosehips says:

    it is? then I can stop now? thanks foxy. I now know the truth. I can go back to bed now and sleep like a baby.

    foxy said: Climate Crap is a lie.


  153. Foxwood says:

    The Climate Crap Theme song

  154. Foxwood says:

    The IPCC and NRC admitted to lies and all other data used by your “99% of the scientists” use that lying data.

    You that refuses to admit they were wrong even after they admitted to it.

    It’s now a fact, they lied.

  155. VotingFemale says:

    I am working on the new blogpost…

    be back shortly

  156. rosehips says:

    so foxy, because they “lied” and the study is flawed you think that automatically makes the theory they are trying to prove wrong?

    I envy you that you can be so sure that you are right. You exhibit characteristics of a man who knows what he believes and knows in his heart that he is right and nothing will cause you to waiver. You don’t need a scientific study to refute the predominant scientific opinion. You only need to discredit one or two of those who claim humans impact climate and to you that is proof that it is all a hoax. I think you should open a university. There are lots of wanna be scientists who would love your criteria for science experiments. In fact, why practice science when all you have to do is discredit it and then surmise that the theory is false and somehow what you believe is true? hmmm… is there a name for that? oh yeah. it’s called delusional. hahaha

  157. rosehips says:

    foxy, because they minipulated the data does not make their theory wrong. It makes them bad scientists and discredits their study. Theirs, however, is not the only study that shows a correlation between human activity and climate. So where’s the study that shows that climate is not affected by humans?

  158. Foxwood says:

    YES! Your right. It make the rest of the data flawed. Why waste any more time on it now.


  159. Foxwood says:

    Now we can move on.

  160. rosehips says:

    I believe in some cases they were trying to cut corners. They relied on observations from hikers and other non-scientists. You can’t rely on the amateur observations of non-professionals. So what is the alternative? Get photos of the glacier over time and analyze them. But just because a person who says that the glaciers are receding because they observed it to be true, does not mean its true. Conversely, just because that person is not a scientist, does not automatically make their statement false.

  161. Foxwood says:

    The hardest part of denial is admitting to it.

  162. Foxwood says:

    It’s a global warming farce.

    One again Rose. Explain how the moon, mars, neptune and venus warmed when we did?

    Did we pollute so much? Don’t let this one give you a headache.

  163. rosehips says:

    haha foxy. I am sorry for the sake of your future great grandchildren that your unwaivering implacability may help contribute to the destruction of the only planet that we currently have to inhabit.

  164. Foxwood says:

    I can see the liberalbots right now.

    “That does not compute…..”
    (smoke whiffs)

  165. rosehips says:

    foxy, when I was a girl growing up, when my father said “discussion over” well, it ended there. hehehe
    back then a man commanded respect from the women around him. man was always right. woman agreed. oh don’t you miss the good ol’ days?

  166. Foxwood says:

    I don’t feel sorry for a lie.

  167. rosehips says:

    foxy, show me that the moon and planets are warming now at the same rate as earth?

  168. rosehips says:

    you love to make claims that you refuse to cite because you know I will shred your sources to bits.

  169. Foxwood says:

    The best liberals have are feelings.

    “Don’t you feel sorry? Don’t you feel bad? What about the children?”

    It takes some effort to think.

  170. SamHenry says:

    Good morning VF, Sami, Rose Henry, my FOX

    Well one thing is certain: There has been little climate change on the blog since we first began discussion of climate change,LOL

  171. Foxwood says:

    You’ve read the sources Rose. Now that was a lie coming from you. You just using this blog is what your doing. I know the trick.

  172. Foxwood says:

    Show your false facts?

  173. rosehips says:

    foxy, on your deathbed, when the planet is dried up and your water has been reduced to a trickle, you might be given a few precious drops of h2o on your tongue as a last compassinate act and you might muster just enough energy to mumble under your breath “they lied!” and then you die, but not without getting in your last word to show the libs what fools they were.

  174. Foxwood says:

    You know you can google my facts.

    Your scientists lied, it’s now proven.

  175. rosehips says:

    foxy, discrediting a study does not prove it’s wrong. You need to prove the opposing theory is factual. How do you do that? it’s called science.

  176. Foxwood says:

    Yes it does.

    Do I sense denial?


  177. rosehips says:

    I would love to sit in on a science lecture at Foxwood U. that would be a real education. HAHAHAHA

  178. Foxwood says:

    I won’t say it Rosey.

    You left that wide open.


  179. samhenry says:

    VF – is there any reason why my comments are not posting?

  180. samhenry says:

    Morning all

    Little climate change on the blog I see lol

  181. Foxwood says:

    More false “facts”, Rosey.


  182. samhenry says:

    False prophets? NEVER! LOL

  183. Foxwood says:

    I hate calling you out, but your wrong.

    Google the planets warming when the earth was warming. There are several articles from well know scientists.

    You won’t do it.

  184. rosehips says:

    okay, it’s been fun but I am ready to drop this debate. I will go to my grave knowing that at least I tried to help people to see that everything we do has an effect. You may reject the education you recieved foxy, but I am thankful for things I learned about the way the ecosystem works and the effects of negative feedback on a system. It is very difficult for me to fathom how intelligent people can dismiss our impact so readily. It saddens me.

  185. samhenry says:

    Can either of you “see me.”

  186. rosehips says:

    you hate calling me out? I find that hard to believe. hehe

    SH, I just now noticed you have joined us. Welcome girl!

  187. samhenry says:

    Rose – you are correct in most things – FOX is correct in most things but according to the invisible nature of me on the blog during this discussion – I am neither.

  188. samhenry says:

    Rose – thank god for recognition. Very good to see you and my FOX

  189. Foxwood says:

    Ok, Rosey… I give up… You win…


    Did you see someone?

  190. samiam60 says:

    Good Morning SamH and Rose.


    Your a better man than me.

  191. Foxwood says:

    My forehead is bloody, Sami…

    Was I imagining it. Did I see SamH?

  192. samhenry says:

    This subject like many in science, has not yet produced consensus. Look at the hits poor Darwin is taking after all these years. He looks like a picture of St. Sebastian in any major art museum – riddled with arrows – looking patiently skyward. Not for me. RAGE, RAGE, RAGE against whatever the quote said.

    There is a scientific method that has worked for centuries. Thank God the earth is flat theory was not confirmed by this way of proceeding.

  193. VotingFemale says:

    Good Morning SamHenry! Rosehips!

  194. samhenry says:

    Looks like I got off at the wrong stop. Heeeeeelp.

  195. Pingback: Tea Party Voters now shift gaze on PA-12 Dist House Seat vacated by Murtha (D-PA) « VotingFemale

  196. 152 says:

    I didn’t see the game, but that Letterman-Oprah-Leno spot seems to be the only Super Bowl ad that was a hit.

  197. rosehips says:

    152, we are over on the next post. See VF’s latest link just above your comment. You have caused quite a little stir here. Do we know you from somewhere? lol

  198. Pingback: God sends Chicago a wake-up message… « VotingFemale

  199. Pingback: Sarah Palin vs Barack Obama; Real Class vs The Angry Man-Child « VotingFemale

  200. Pingback: VotingFemale

  201. Pingback: yes another Progressive Scandal; Operatives drain Union Dues to fund Media Attacks on American Voters « VotingFemale

  202. Pingback: Get ready for Progressives’ racism and sexism; Angela McGlowan is running for Congress « VotingFemale

  203. Pingback: breaking: House Democrat Charlie Wilson died today « VotingFemale

  204. Pingback: Sarah Palin brings down anther one; Palin stalking Progressive Troll Eric Robinson makes a total ass out of himself « VotingFemale

  205. Pingback: The Final Kennedy bites the dust; Obama now spared backing another Progressive loser « VotingFemale

  206. SamHenry says:

    Live coverage of the America’s cup at You will have to download the viewer but reception is excellent. Live coverage.

    I understand it is at YouTube as well.

    They call the men who man the wings the “wing caddies.”

    Dogs all settled in. Territories extablished. Whew.

  207. samhenry says:

    I like this post, CAT.

  208. Pingback: No place for whack-job 911 truther Debra Medina in the Tea Party « VotingFemale

  209. Pingback: Does Obama see NASA as Racist? Takes $3.6 billion from NASA; Gives $4 billion to ACORN « VotingFemale

  210. Pingback: Get a life, Professors’ Ogletree and Obama; a person’s race imparts immunity? lol « VotingFemale

  211. Pingback: Socialist Global Warming Hoaxsters – the Village of the Damned « VotingFemale

  212. Pingback: CNN and Huffington Post must be added to DHS Domestic Terrorist Org List « VotingFemale

Comments are closed.