Juan Williams’ Manties in a twist; Goes Postal over Sarah Palin Star Power hahaha

Juan Williams of FOX News, typical Socialist Sexist Bigot

My My My… Juan Williams must be taking Rant Lessons from Geraldo Rivera as he spews  memorized propaganda to some invisible entity on the table in front of him.

Juan? You need to get your MEDs adjusted, PAL… or you are not going to make it to see Sarah Palin sworn into the Office of the President of the United States.

Aren’t the Socialists just too cute when they go postal? Am I right or am I right? ROFL

Juan pulling Sexism on women who are Conservative implying Conservative Women Politicans with children must be bad Mommies on the heels of him being called a Porch Monkey on air by a another Socialist over a difference of political opinion just last month is hypocrisy of legend.

I guess the only good bigotry is Socialist on Conservative Racial and Sexual Bigotry, huh Juan?

In other news… Sarah Palin did something subtle in a stroke of genius with her new book Going Rogue… she decided not to provide an index in her book.

What, you might ask, was the genius of that?

Answer:

(Hat Tip to Rush Limbaugh)

Many Political Self-Important Notables in Politics and the Lame Stream Media discovered Sarah Palin’s slyness as soon as they got their hands on her book. See, most of them wont read a political book they did not write… they instead scan the index to see if their name is there.

Surprise! Surprise! No Index! AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Guess you will just have to read the book, dears! 😉

BTW, Rush’s article, Scared State-Run Media Elites Go Bonkers Over Sarah Palin’s Book, is a Great Read regardless of whether you are a Conservative, Socialist, or Marxist!

The desperation in the article is so palpable you could slice it with a knife.

__________________________________________________

Related Reading…

Palin’s Popularity vs. Media Mania

Bernie Goldberg On O’Reilly: Liberals Hate Palin Because They Hate Middle America (Video)

Sarah Palin Goes Rogue– Slams Newsweek For Their Sexist Hit Piece

Feds to women in their 40s: Skip the mammogram; Update: Meet the task force

Smearing Someone Who Knows Someone Who Knows Sarah Palin

Live Blogging Sarah — Get a Life People

AP assigns 11 “factcheckers” to Sarah Palin’s book – and they still get it wrong

Sarah-mania!

Juan Williams shows his true liberal colors – Bashes Sarah Palin as a “bad mother”

O’Keefe & Giles: ACORN Child Prostitution Exposé in Los Angeles (video)

AP Buries Inconvenient Results of Latest Healthcare Poll

Sarah Palin on Oprah: Live Blog

Sarah Palin faces the Charybdis of Lake Michigan today; In other news, Sarah Palin prepares to slay the media Hydra

Did Hoffman Concede to Soon?

Californians Unplugging the Political Machine by Fighting Union Thuggery

Nouriel Roubini: This is why they call him Dr. Doom.

K-Lo: Palin book more about reintroduction than score-settling

Quote of the Day Honorable Mentions, Part 7

McCain asks aides to ignore Palin; they ignore him instead

Rush: Conservative Sarah Palin Drives Media Elites Bonkers

Video: Sarah Palin talks to Barbara Walters about her future

President Doublespeak tells Chinese Students free speech is great. Unless your a Chinese dissident locked up during his visit or on Fox.

DONATE TO THE NEW AD CAMPAIGN AGAINST OBAMACARE

Oh, That Liberal Fascism

Off to the weekly midwive’s visit…

OOPs at My.BarackObama.com and Illegal Alien Supporters Clash with Teabaggers – QUICK HIT COMMENTS for November 17, 2009

Schumer! Guns! Fort Hood! Mondays Moonbat Of The Day


Advertisements

About VotingFemale

I am a female voter, as my blog name implies. I vote for conservatives. I am a political opponent of Leftists, Progressives, Socialists, Marxists, and Communists.
This entry was posted in Lame Stream Media, Sarah Palin and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Juan Williams’ Manties in a twist; Goes Postal over Sarah Palin Star Power hahaha

  1. samiam60 says:

    Juan for some reason reminds me of a certain Ireporter who was recently banned?

    Are they related?

  2. tellitlikeitis says:

    Poor Juan is watching the first African American president go down in flames and just can’t take it any more. He is coming unglued.

  3. samiam60 says:

    The Progressives have nothing to fear but ……

    Sarah herself!

    Ahahahahahaahhhhaaaaa you lib commies are running scared and it shows.

  4. tellitlikeitis says:

    I imagine in Juan’s liberal mind he just can’t imagine anyone supporting Palin and rejecting the boob we have in the White house.

  5. samiam60 says:

    I have to believe that CNN is losing sponsors left and right ( no pun intended) What, with the worst ratings in the News Media who in their right mind would want to advertise on a Loser Network.

  6. tellitlikeitis says:

    Sam, They know Obama is going to be a complete disaster and they are running for cover now to escape the fallout.

  7. samiam60 says:

    Good Afternoon my fellow Patriots.

    I am late this day but had much to do this morning.

    I have a new name for our Beloved President.

    After watching is narrow Arse bow down before the Commies over there I realized what a Geek Obama really is. Think about it? He is a Geek.

    I shall now refer to his Hindass as the:

    Are you all ready for this one? Hmmmmmmm?

  8. samiam60 says:

    The Geeker in Chief 🙂

    Taaaaaaa Daaaaaaa!

  9. Foxwood says:

    Don’t tell me that Sarah is Not going to run. She had all the right answers On Rush’s show just minutes ago.

    She’s running. Go Sarah Go!

  10. samiam60 says:

    Congressman Blasts White House for Faulty Job Data on Government Web Site

    by

    The government Web site — Recovery.gov — is under fire for posting a number of jobs created in congressional districts that don’t exist and for accepting unrealistic data from several reporting outlets.

  11. Foxwood says:

    I’m running too… just to catch up to you, VF!

  12. samiam60 says:

    The Democratic chairman of the House Appropriations Committee is demanding greater accountability from the the Obama administration after gross inaccuracies were found on a government Web site that tracks jobs purportedly saved or created by the $787 billion stimulus plan.

    In a statement late Monday, Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, chairman of the House committee, called the inaccuracies “outrageous” and said the administration owes the American public “a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes.”

    “Credibility counts in government and stupid mistakes like this undermine it,” Obey said. “We designed the Recovery Act to be open and transparent and I expect the the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, who oversees the recovery act Web site and data to have information that is accurate, reliable and understandable to the American public.”

    The site — Recovery.gov — is under fire for posting a number of jobs created in congressional districts that don’t exist and for accepting unrealistic data from several reporting outlets.

    For instance, the Web site reported that 30 jobs were saved or created with $761,420 of federal stimulus spending in Arizona’s 15th Congressional District. One problem with the claim — the state has only eight districts

    The site also lists 12 other non-existent districts in Arizona where jobs were reportedly saved or created. It also lists imaginary districts in at least three other states, including Oklahoma, Iowa, and Connecticut.

    One recipient of stimulus funds, Talladega County of Alabama, claimed that it had saved or created 5,000 jobs from only $42,000 in government money — which would amount to $8.40 in annual income per job if each position received an equal amount of funding.

    G. Edward DeSeve, Obama’s appointee to oversee the government’s federal stimulus program, acknowledged the mistakes and said the White House is reviewing all reports with a “fine tooth comb” and working to correct inaccuracies.

    In a blog posted to the White House Web site Monday, DeSeve said, “we fully agree with those who find the mistakes in the data frustrating — and we’ve been working with the Recovery Board to find the mistakes, and fix them.

    “Just because mistakes are inevitable in any new system — especially one this large, and this new — doesn’t mean they are acceptable.

    But DeSeve went on to downplay the impact of the mistakes, calling the inaccuracies “relatively few” and claiming they do not change the “fundamental conclusions one can draw from the data.”

    “Some of the mistakes are frustrating typos and coding errors that don’t undermine information at the heart of the data,” DeSeve wrote, adding that “transparency is going to be messy.”

    ABC News reported Monday that the White House slashed 60,000 jobs from its most recent report on the recovery program as a result of the faulty data.

    Officials with the Recovery Board reportedly told the network that the mistakes were caused by human error.

    “We report what the recipients submit to us,” Ed Pound, communications director for the board, told ABC.

    Meanwhile, groups like the NAACP and Hispanic advocacy group National Council of La Raza are expected to speak on Capitol Hill Tuesday to urge President Obama and Congress to pass a new jobs creation package aimed at minority communities. Unemployment among African Americans is at 15 percent, higher than the 10.2 percent nationwide.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/17/congressman-blasts-white-house-faulty-job-data-government-web-site-849363506/

  13. samiam60 says:

    Hearing that Major Garret of Fox News will be interviewing the Geeker in Chief tonight around 9 to 10 PM.

    I could not confirm this just yet cause it came off of Twitter.

  14. samiam60 says:

    Some lawmakers on Capitol Hill are blasting new guidelines from a government task force that recommends against routine mammograms for women under 50, questioning whether they are tantamount to health care “rationing” in the fight against the No. 2 cancer killer in U.S. women.

  15. samiam60 says:

    Some lawmakers on Capitol Hill are blasting new guidelines from a government task force that recommends against routine mammograms for women under 50, questioning whether they are tantamount to health care “rationing” in the fight against the No. 2 cancer killer in U.S. women.

    “I absolutely believe this could be a form of rationing,” said Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga, a practicing obstetrician and gynecologist for 26 years. “It scares me.”

    Gingrey told FoxNews.com on Tuesday that he and other lawmakers are gravely concerned that insurance companies will seize upon the new guidelines to deny mammogram coverage for women under 50.

    “Early detection is hugely important,” Gingrey said, noting that breast self-exams are critical in looking for cancerous tissue masses.

    The new government recommendations, released Monday by the Preventive Services Task Force of the Department of Health and Human Services, recommend against regular mammography tests in women aged 40 to 49. The guidelines also downplay the effectiveness of self-examinations and advise that women aged 50 to 74 years receive mammograms every other year.

    The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a government panel of doctors and scientists, concluded that such early and frequent screenings often lead to false alarms and unneeded biopsies without substantially improving women’s odds of survival.

    “The benefits are less and the harms are greater when screening starts in the 40s,” said Dr. Diana Petitti, vice chairwoman of the panel.

    Dr. Eric Braverman, a clinical assistant professor of integrative medicine at Cornell Weill Medical College in New York, also backs the guidelines, arguing that mammographies are not nearly as effective in detection as some other tests, like MRI’s and ultrasounds.

    “I’m not impressed by mammograms in general,” said Braverman, who called manual examinations a “total failure.”

    “I support the new guidelines because I think it will lead to better testing. [The ultrasound] is a better screening procedure that’s safer and easier and picks up things fast,” he said, adding that he thinks women should receive ultrasounds as part of their routine medical exams, beginning at an early age.

    But critics of the new rules say ignoring the health risk is not worth it. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women and the seventh leading cause of death overall for women.

    “For every seven to 10 women that are being overdiagnosed or overtreated, we’re saving one woman’s life and I think for me that’s worth it,” said Dr. Cynara Commer, a professor of surgery at Mt. Sinai’s Surgical Oncology Department in New York.

    “That’s worth finding that one cancer at early stage as opposed to late stage, and the argument that this is saving cost is sort of irrelevant because if we end up finding cancers at later stages, those women have to go much more aggressive treatment,” Commer added.

    Kathleen Lederer, 56 of Houston, Texas, first detected her breast cancer through a self-examination when she was 39-year-old. Lederer alerted her physician, who found after performing a mammography and biopsy that she had cancer.

    “I would be dead if I waited until 50,” Lederer told FoxNews.com, adding that she was “horrified” by the government’s latest guidelines.

    “Is this just a way to start cutting costs for government-run health care?” she asked.

    Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said the new guidelines may discourage a number of women from seeking necessary preventive screening.

    “The concern is that many people are not complying now with what is currently recommended,” he said. “There is a potential that this is going to confuse women and make them less likely to be treated.

    “I prefer to think that this is just not a conspiracy to save costs,” Cassidy added.

    For most of the past two decades, the American Cancer Society has recommended annual mammograms beginning at 40, and it reiterated that position on Monday.

    “This is one screening test I recommend unequivocally, and would recommend to any woman 40 and over,” the society’s chief medical officer, Dr. Otis Brawley, said in a statement.

    Commer said she is very concerned that the new guidelines are the top of a slippery slope toward rationing, and questioned the timing as the Senate is about to vote on health care reforms that could end up containing a so-called public option.

    “The government-run insurance companies are definitely going to be using these federal guidelines as opposed to using the American Cancer Society guidelines, and the American Cancer Society is not going along with these guidelines, and we can only hope that the private insurance companies don’t follow suit,” she said.

    “I think it’s coming down to saving costs. I don’t think we should be doing that at the expense of women,” she added.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/17/critics-health-care-rationing-new-breast-cancer-screening-recommendations/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Flatest+%2528FOXNews.com+-+Latest+Head

  16. samiam60 says:

    “I absolutely believe this could be a form of rationing,” said Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga, a practicing obstetrician and gynecologist for 26 years. “It scares me.”

  17. samhenry says:

    Mammograms should not be controversial issue. Common sense tells you that it can’t hurt to have one when you are younger. Many women I know have developed cancer in their 40s.

    By all means, talk with your doctor but if he goes along with these guidelines, talk with another doctor.

    Hey Tellit and Sami – does the government have any guidelines for male “beasts”? See, it can hit you, too.

  18. samhenry says:

    VF, I swear if you don’t take some R & R from this war on Socialism, you will suffer from Post traumatic blog stress syndrome

  19. samiam60 says:

    Hu to Obama: So who is this Sarah Palin?

    Obama to Hu: Hu, how is the Mrs. and all the little Hu’s?

    Hu to Obama: Why so many Libs afraid of Sarah Palin?

    Obama to Hu: Who?

    Hu to Obama: Why you not answer my question?

    Obama to Hu: About who, Hu?

    Hu to Obama: I think she going to kick your butt in 2012.

    Obama to Hu: Who, Hu, are you speaking of.
    I have never met her and don’t really know much about her.

    Hu to Obama: YOU LIE round eye!

    You all Wee-Weeded up about her, round eye.

  20. tellitlikeitis says:

  21. samiam60 says:

    SamH says:

    Hey Tellit and Sami – does the government have any guidelines for male “beasts”? See, it can hit you, too.

    Samiam to SamH:

    I don’t know for sure but I did get an infection once from a tossel.

  22. AFVET says:

    Juan works for NPR.
    When a conservative congress cuts their funding Juan will become more conservative.

  23. Foxwood says:

    Hu to Obutthole: Second base!

  24. VotingFemale says:

    Hi AMVET! yeah Juan is an NPR guy who is a regular guest on FOX News…

Comments are closed.