Sarah Palin Calls The Obama on his BS re: Obama Care Death Panel Denials

Palin Pushs Back on Obama's Socialist Lies

Sarah Palin Pushs Back on Obama's Socialist Lies

Hey Obama?
Your Bull Crap is Showing


Concerning the “Death Panels”

by Sarah Palin
August 12, 2009, at 11:55pm

Yesterday President Obama responded to my statement that Democratic health care proposals would lead to rationed care; that the sick, the elderly, and the disabled would suffer the most under such rationing; and that under such a system these “unproductive” members of society could face the prospect of government bureaucrats determining whether they deserve health care.

The President made light of these concerns. He said:

“Let me just be specific about some things that I’ve been hearing lately that we just need to dispose of here. The rumor that’s been circulating a lot lately is this idea that somehow the House of Representatives voted for death panels that will basically pull the plug on grandma because we’ve decided that we don’t, it’s too expensive to let her live anymore….It turns out that I guess this arose out of a provision in one of the House bills that allowed Medicare to reimburse people for consultations about end-of-life care, setting up living wills, the availability of hospice, etc. So the intention of the members of Congress was to give people more information so that they could handle issues of end-of-life care when they’re ready on their own terms. It wasn’t forcing anybody to do anything.” [1]

The provision that President Obama refers to is Section 1233 of HR 3200, entitled “Advance Care Planning Consultation.” [2] With all due respect, it’s misleading for the President to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients. The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context.

Section 1233 authorizes advanced care planning consultations for senior citizens on Medicare every five years, and more often “if there is a significant change in the health condition of the individual … or upon admission to a skilled nursing facility, a long-term care facility… or a hospice program.” [3] During those consultations, practitioners must explain “the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice,” and the government benefits available to pay for such services. [4]

Now put this in context. These consultations are authorized whenever a Medicare recipient’s health changes significantly or when they enter a nursing home, and they are part of a bill whose stated purpose is “to reduce the growth in health care spending.” [5] Is it any wonder that senior citizens might view such consultations as attempts to convince them to help reduce health care costs by accepting minimal end-of-life care? As Charles Lane notes in the Washington Post, Section 1233 “addresses compassionate goals in disconcerting proximity to fiscal ones…. If it’s all about alleviating suffering, emotional or physical, what’s it doing in a measure to “bend the curve” on health-care costs?” [6]

As Lane also points out:

Though not mandatory, as some on the right have claimed, the consultations envisioned in Section 1233 aren’t quite “purely voluntary,” as Rep. Sander M. Levin (D-Mich.) asserts. To me, “purely voluntary” means “not unless the patient requests one.” Section 1233, however, lets doctors initiate the chat and gives them an incentive — money — to do so. Indeed, that’s an incentive to insist.

Patients may refuse without penalty, but many will bow to white-coated authority. Once they’re in the meeting, the bill does permit “formulation” of a plug-pulling order right then and there. So when Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) denies that Section 1233 would “place senior citizens in situations where they feel pressured to sign end-of-life directives that they would not otherwise sign,” I don’t think he’s being realistic. [7]

Even columnist Eugene Robinson, a self-described “true believer” who “will almost certainly support” “whatever reform package finally emerges”, agrees that “If the government says it has to control health-care costs and then offers to pay doctors to give advice about hospice care, citizens are not delusional to conclude that the goal is to reduce end-of-life spending.” [8]

So are these usually friendly pundits wrong? Is this all just a “rumor” to be “disposed of”, as President Obama says? Not according to Democratic New York State Senator Ruben Diaz, Chairman of the New York State Senate Aging Committee, who writes:

Section 1233 of House Resolution 3200 puts our senior citizens on a slippery slope and may diminish respect for the inherent dignity of each of their lives…. It is egregious to consider that any senior citizen … should be placed in a situation where he or she would feel pressured to save the government money by dying a little sooner than he or she otherwise would, be required to be counseled about the supposed benefits of killing oneself, or be encouraged to sign any end of life directives that they would not otherwise sign. [9]

Of course, it’s not just this one provision that presents a problem. My original comments concerned statements made by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a health policy advisor to President Obama and the brother of the President’s chief of staff. Dr. Emanuel has written that some medical services should not be guaranteed to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens….An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.” [10] Dr. Emanuel has also advocated basing medical decisions on a system which “produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.” [11]

President Obama can try to gloss over the effects of government authorized end-of-life consultations, but the views of one of his top health care advisors are clear enough. It’s all just more evidence that the Democratic legislative proposals will lead to health care rationing, and more evidence that the top-down plans of government bureaucrats will never result in real health care reform.

[1] See
[2] See
[3] See HR 3200 sec. 1233 (hhh)(1); Sec. 1233 (hhh)(3)(B)(1), above.
[4] See HR 3200 sec. 1233 (hhh)(1)(E), above.
[5] See
[6] See].
[7] Id.
[8] See].
[9] See
[10] See
[11] See


Related reading:

LisainTx’s Blog:
Born to be Free and Fascism Straight Up! and White In America: Affirmative Action advocates Discrimination
When The Giant Wakes; The Revolution Begins.. and THE FACE OF SOCIALISM
ArleneArmy: Obama’s Jackbooted Thugs Beat Down on Black Patriot

Michelle Malkin: The Obamacare horror story you won’t hear
and  Mr. Postman – The Obamacare Remix and What’s the SEIU up to now?; Another Democrat calls Obamacare protesters “political terrorists” and Oh, Sheila and Democrats now taking refuge at SEIU offices and Little girl at Obama town hall has not-so-random political connections and Encounters with “the mob” and Forget Brown Shirts. Beware the Purple Shirts and A doctor takes issue with the Washington Post and Um, who’s bought and pay for by the drug lobby? and “Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American.” and Rep. Tsongas tries to explain why Congress is exempt from Obamacare. Fails.
Chicago Ray Report: Tsongas health care forum attracts overflow crowds (Right Wing Mob, lol)
Right Voices: Specter: “I could be somewhere else. I don’t get any extra pay — I don’t have any requirement to be here.”
Greg Gutfeld, Big Hollywood: Daily Gut: Townhalls vs. Twitter and Daily Gut: Plants
Legal Insurrection: Now The Left Doesn’t Know Obama
Nice Deb: How Obama Is Pitting Americans Against Each Other
Ztower: Defending The Party Line – Here Comes The Sun – UPDATE
Pirates! Man Your Women: Note the Concern of Your Rulers
DaTechguy’s Blog: Obama doesn’t dare hit SEIU too hard; they know things
Fire Andrea Mitchell!: Sheila Jackson Lee (Democrat – Texas) shows where her priorities are – her CELLPHONE and Exposed: The little “mean signs girl” Julia Hall from today’s New Hampshire Townhall
Pronk Palisades: The American People Confront The Red Shirts (ACORN) and Purple Shirts (SEIU) Bullhorns and Beatings Over Obama Care!
Daily Uprising: In Defense of Mobsters: Why Shouting At Town Halls Doesn’t Bother Us As Much As It Does Pelosi/Hoyer/Gibbs
The Clampdown: Sheila, Take A Bow
Hot Air: Tsongas: I won’t take ObamaCare because I have better options
PUMABydesign001’s Blog: Paranoid Democratic Politicians Turning on the People; Refusing Accountability
Below The Beltway: ObamaCare Continues To Lose Support
Pronk Palisades: The American People Confront The Red Shirts (ACORN) and Purple Shirts (SEIU) Bullhorns and Beatings Over Obama Care!
Stop The ACLU: LA Times Misses The Irony In Labeling ObamaNuts “Grassroots”
Atlas Shrugs: Tampa, St. Louis …Obama’s Union Thugs are Beating People up at Town Hall Meetings
The Angry White Guy: Obama Propaganda Hall Meeting
Frugal Café Blog Zone: World Net Daily Asks, “Why is National Guard Recruiting for ‘Internment’ Cops?” and Say “No” to ObamaCare: Protests Growing Against ObamaCare… More Town Hall Meeting and Tea Party Protests and “Town Hall” or “Town Hell”? Congressman Mike Pence & John Boehner Respond to Pelosi’s Insults Against Americans Exercising Free Speech about ObamaCare (video) and Pelosi Calls Protesters “Astro-turf” & Sen. Barbara “Don’t Call Me Ma’am” Boxer Says ObamaCare Town Hall Protesters Are “Too Well-Dressed” So Must Be Fake (video)
Protein Wisdom: Who is ‘un-American’?
Ace of Spades HQ: The Chicago Way: Obama Reaches Not-So-Secret Deal to Not Push Down Pharmaceutical Prices Any Further; In Exchange, BigPharma Will Spend Up to $150 Million in Ads to Push ObamaCare
The Barton Bulletin: Could There Be A Peasant Uprising Afoot?
Burt Prelutsky: ObamaCare is Really ObamaDoesn’tCare — So Vote For Gracie
VotingFemale Speaks!: Obama-Pelosi Declare WAR; Demonizing Health Industry; Warning, Socialist Demons At Work
Lighthouse Patriot Journal: Govt Watch: “Change” For the Worse and No Marked Change in Politics as Usual
Hot Air: Video: Democrat screams at constituent for asking tough question on health care
Steven Crowder, Big Hollywood: Getting Torn Apart by an Angry, Un-American Mob! and Lonewolf Diaries: It’s Time to Flip the Bird to Tyranny–Flag Yourself!
Quipster: Georgia Democratic Congressman Blows His Top At Constituent
Tarpon’s Swamp: Meltdown: Democratic Congressman David Scott of Georgia Goes Berserk at Town Hall
Jim Blazsik: Daniel Hannan and the looming disaster of ObamaCare
Generic Rant – NOT usually Politically Correct!: Union Thugs attempting to shut down protesters
Sister Toldjah: Pelosi and Hoyer to ObamaCare opponents: You are “Un-American”
Neoavatar: Americans Will Not Stop Protesting…
Gateway Pundit: Shocker! Little Girl Who Asked Obama Question at New Hampshire Town Hall Was a Plant
Temple of Mut: WE ARE NOT THE STAGERS! Leftist Activists try create faux imagery to squash our dissent.
JustOneMinute: Because Children Are Useful Props Except When You Don’t Want Them To Be

About VotingFemale

I am a female voter, as my blog name implies. I vote for conservatives. I am a political opponent of Leftists, Progressives, Socialists, Marxists, and Communists.
This entry was posted in American Socialism, ObamaCare, Sarah Palin and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Sarah Palin Calls The Obama on his BS re: Obama Care Death Panel Denials

  1. Foxwood says:

    Is it me, or does Sarah have her left hook ready?

  2. samiam60 says:

    Thank you Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State for providing us a Vindication of all we speak and Believe concerning the Obama Deceptions we all now SEE.

  3. Pingback: Exposed: The little “mean signs girl” Julia Hall from New Hampshire Townhall not so random afterall | Fire Andrea Mitchell!

Comments are closed.