Monthly Archives: November 2009

Sarah Palin Surge; now lead in the polls, so says Washington Post

The Surge is Working!

Don’t Worry Sarah, we got your back, girlfriend! The Socialist snots are having brain explosions over our successes, and yours. This is OUR COUNTRY, NOT THEIRS …and it will ever be thus. Chicago Punks are a dime a dozen… you are one in a Billion.

The Washington Post has released their latest political poll which shows Sarah Palin in a decisive lead according to the conservative base which includes conservatives in both the Independent and GOP camps.

11. (ASKED OF LEANED REPUBLICANS) Thinking about Republican leaders today – which one person best reflects the core values of the Republican Party?

Sarah Palin 18
John McCain 13
Mike Huckabee 7
Mitt Romney 6
Newt Gingrich 4

16. (ASKED OF LEANED REPUBLICANS) If the 2012 Republican presidential primary or caucus in your state were being held today, for whom would you vote?

Sarah Palin 17
Mike Huckabee 10
Mitt Romney 9
John McCain 7
Newt Gingrich 2
Bobby Jindal 1
Ron Paul 1
Rudy Giuliani 1
Tim Pawlenty 1

41% of the adults polled say they definitely would NOT vote for Obama.

24% of the adults polled say they would definitely vote to re-elect Obama in 2012.

This is bad news for the Socialists who correctly interpret this as growing consensus of the Collective Conservative Grassroots Coalitions standing behind a Principles First Common Sense Leader, Sarah Palin.

The common reaction amongst Socialists to the surging popularity of conservatism and Sarah Palin’s Mega-MOJO?

A picture is worth a thousand words…

Leftists reaction to Sarah Palin's MOJO Continue reading

Fact Checking the WhiteHouse.Gov Blog’s propaganda

hat tip to commenter M2

M2 said:

Wow, check this out! The WH goes after Krauthammer (who also wrote the best article of his career I think), f this WH and their targeting of private citizens!!!!!!!

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/11/28/whitehouse-gov-plays-media-critic-calls-krauthammer-s-washington-post-col

What Charles Kruthammer said:

This [ObamaCare] reform is the most difficult to enact, for two reasons. The unions oppose it. And Barack Obama savaged the idea when John McCain proposed it during last year’s campaign.

Insuring the uninsured is a moral imperative. The problem is that the Democrats have chosen the worst possible method — a $1 trillion new entitlement of stupefying arbitrariness and inefficiency.

The better choice is targeted measures that attack the inefficiencies of the current system one by one — tort reform, interstate purchasing and taxing employee benefits. It would take 20 pages to write such a bill, not 2,000 — and provide the funds to cover the uninsured without wrecking both U.S. health care and the U.S. Treasury.

What Obama’s proxy said in response:

“In today’s Washington Post, Charles Krauthammer takes great pains to paint a bleak picture of health care reform as ‘monstrous,’ ‘overregulated,’ and rife with ‘arbitrary bureaucratic inventions,’” Pfeiffer wrote. ”The columnist’s argument may be cogent and well-written, but it is wholly inaccurate.”

specifically Obama’s proxy said…

President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum directing the Secretary of HHS to move forward with an initiative to give states and health systems the opportunity to apply for medical liability demonstration projects. Section 2531 of the House bill also includes a voluntary state incentive grants program to encourage states to develop alternatives to traditional malpractice litigation.

FACT: A presidential memo is not a law. If it were, the GITMO detention center would already be closed.

FACT: There are no changes within the Congressional bills referred to as ObamaCare that changes Federal Law making regulatory changes to cap Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Claims.

specifically Obama’s proxy said…

Section 9001 of the Senate bill does impose a fee on high-cost health care plans.  (A PDF of the Senate bill is available here.)  To clarify: This is a fee on insurance companies that offer high-cost plans that drive up the cost of health care for all Americans, not a tax on individuals.

FACT: A tax on so-called Cadillac Health Care Plans is a selective and focused tax. It does not tax the all encompassing bundle of heretofore untaxed employment benefits of all Americans.

specifically Obama’s proxy said…

Section 1333 of the Senate bill allows for interstate health care choice compacts. Coupled with insurance market reforms to ensure individuals are not discriminated against, this policy will expand health care choices to millions of Americans.

FACT: There are two ObamaCare Bills not one bill; One in the Senate and another one in the House of Representatives. Therefore neither bill represents the true and intended nature of Health Care Reform, in and of itself.

FACT: Section 1333 does not mandate federal tort reform as written in the proposed  pre-exemption of State Benefit Mandate Laws (Page 219, section 1333). Insurers may form “health care compacts” (page 219) and “Nationwide plans” (page 222) which would only be subject to the health benefit mandate laws and regulations of the State in which the plan was “written or issued.”

Assuming that the proposed new national minimum benefit guidelines (page 102, section 1302) would apply to the compacts and Nationwide plans, the national minimums would become default rules because insurers would certainly choose to be regulated by the weakest state. As a result, millions of Americans could lose insurance coverage of important medical treatments and services such as AIDS/HIV testing, reconstructive surgery, home health care services, and child delivery and mastectomy minimum hospital stays.

Provisions in the bill allowing states to “opt-out” of permitting Nationwide plans and “opt-in” to interstate compacts offer little protection. The 1,000 health insurance lobbyists estimated to be working the federal health reform bill, and the industry’s unlimited capacity to buy votes with campaign contributions, would be marshaled to advance the insurers’ interest at the state level.

Continue reading

Sarah Palin Envy triggers Socialist Head Spinning… would ObamaCare cover Exorcisms for Socialists? hahaha

Sorry Socialists!
Your head spinning is a national laughing stock!

A few days ago, Mary Walsh in the character of Marg Delahunty, a Susan Boyle Of Canadian Broadcasting, wanted a little attention from Gov. Sarah Palin during one of Sarah’s numerous book signing stops.

In an act of compassion and kindness, Sarah responded to this lady, even though it was apparent Mary aka Marg was a few french fries short of a happy meal.

It was a very sweet and charitable thing to do. Sarah could have just ignored Mary, but she didn’t want to do that to the poor woman.

Sarah answered Mary aka Marg’s questions and it absolutely made Mary’s day!! She was soooo HAPPY! A Lefty Looney Wannbe Comedian, but happy, nonetheless. Mary? I hope you have a second source of income dear.

The ever Postal Leftist Bloglodytes tried to paint the gracious exchange as ‘Marg’ pwning Sarah.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Huffington Post: Palin Tricked By Comedian Again, Says Canada Should Drop Public Health Care

Raw Story: Palin tells Canada to get rid of public health care

Poor little Socialist Bloggers… I pity them. Obama is going down like the Titanic as is the Socialist Majority in Congress. They are now eating their own tails by attacking Obama over his not wanting to watch his already dismal job approval numbers go below 30% were he to pull the US Military out of Afghanistan.

Life Sucks, huh, Socialists?

You may now resume your Head Spinning
and Burping Up Green Goo
as you watch the next president in action!

Sarah Palin Supporters at Book Signing

Continue reading

Sarah Palin is Relevant and will be even more so; the Left is acclimating slowly to that reality

Sarah Palin offhandedly dispatches one of Lame Stream Media’s slimiest trolls, Andrea Mitchell (MSNBC), who mistakenly thought she would draw Palin blood.

Not only did Sarah deal with the troll as the light work Andrea Mitchell happens to be, Sarah did it as she multi-tasked her attention to other things going on around her at the time.

Andrea Mitchell looked like a rank amateur cub reporter trying to get attention from the Famous and Powerful Politician of rock star popularity… Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin is unleashed, reloaded, and free at last, free at last… to do it HER way: win, lose, or draw.

Sarah bucked certain Alaska state politicians who were corrupt slime buckets heralding from both the DEM party and the GOP to rise from Oil Regulator, Mayor, and city council member to the elected post of Governor.

She did it as a feminine and intelligent woman sans the pant-suited masculine approach and the neutered approach adopted by some women politicians who are afraid of the combination of strikingly good looks and high intelligence.

As a result of her dedication to, and personally identifying with, the real bosses of government officials, We the People, Sarah sharply reversed the states’ down turn by such measures as curtailing corruption that sold state government legislation to the highest bidder, the Big Oil companies and other deep pocketed special interests.

As Sarah entered national politics she had a running bi-partisan job approval rate over 80%, higher than any other sitting governor, based on results on her handling of the job of governor.

That she was considered the greatest political danger the DEM Party faced in 2008 was the reason the no holds barred Socialist War on Palin was spared no expense and spared no effort.

And, who played a pivotal role in attempting to destroy a popular and successful governor and public servant? The Lame Stream Media…

Just goes to show… you can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but not all of the people all of the time.

Sarah had not done anything to deserve the war of hatred waged on her by the Socialists… in fact it was a war of total fear. It was as if Sarah WAS the candidate for president, not vice president… but still the extreme levels of the gutter tactics was unseen in the history of American National Politics.

Liberal websites are now seen discussing not only the begrudged acceptance of Sarah Palin’s viability in 2012, and Liberal Life under a President Palin… but what could Obama possibly do to attempt any kind of a leveling of the playing field in 2012.

One of the suggestions is replacing Joe Biden with a more populist candidate… Oprah Winfrey, who has ironically announced she will leave her talk show in 2011. hahaha

That would be a hoot…

__________________________________________________

Additional reading…

Texas For Palin: Going Rogue: Number One With A Bullet and Alicia Colon on The Importance of Sarah Palin andJack Cashill: Dueling Narratives and Palin Tea Party Convention Keynote Confirmed

On My Watch: The Writings of SamHenry: Palin’s Timing and Moves Textbook Perfection

Frugal Cafe: Washington’s First Thanksgiving Proclamation

Fire Andrea Mitchell: Science Czar John Holdren is directly involved in CRU’s unfolding Climategate scandal

HillBuzz: Jealous of the baby Jesus, current president demands “Obamamas Special” for holidays

Gateway Pundit: Howard Dean: There Isn’t Any Reform In Dem’s Health Care Bill (Audio)

The Other McCain: Sarah Palin: ‘Going Rogue’ book tour

Politics Daily: Ethics Policy Expected to Push Lobbyists From Federal Advisory Panels

Nice Deb: Video: Weather Channel Founder Suing ManBearPig For Fraud

Jamie Wearing Fool: Kinky: Liberals Plan to ‘Spank’ Obama

Animal Farm: Separation of Church and State

Good Time Politics: Colorado Springs: Obama hedging on promises

Lisa in Texas: Navy Seals betrayed by our own government!! Who will be next?

Mad Conservative: George Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation

Moonbat Patrol: Beware Stimulus II The Redux and Politics A Definition, “Figures Lie and Liars Figure”

OhioBelle: A LETTER TO OUR MUSLIM PRESIDENT

That’s Right: Just…One…Day…

Warrant One Girl: Sarah Palin Poll

Flopping Aces: Warming alarmist says CRU scandal “a major blow”, endangers EPA’s anticipated regulatory power

Happy Thanksgiving to my beloved Blog Family, and to all true Americans

We thank you, Lord, for food and friends
And for all the joys this holiday lends;
It’s Thanksgiving Day and we can see
The blessings we receive from Thee.
Thanks to you, Lord, for another good year;
When you live in us, there’s nothing to fear.

To my Blog Family and their Families,
I am blessed by your friendship, Dears.
In this time of national stress, even more so.
We are strong, and together, stronger still.
Never lose faith…
Love Always, VotingFemale

__________

The Relationship between Early America
And Thanksgiving

The Story of American Thanksgiving and God

___________________________________________________

Thanksgiving Blogposts from the Conservative Blog Network…

SamHenry: Obama, We Will Protect the Roots of Thanksgiving. Hold that Thanksgiving Message

Mad Conservative: George Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation

Frugal Cafe: Thanksgiving Art… Artistic Tributes to Thanksgiving, America, and Our Military

S’marty Says: A Neo-Royal in King Arthur’s Court

Texas For Sarah Palin: Sarah Palin: We have so much to be thankful for

Heritage Foundation: Morning Bell: Lincoln’s Thanksgiving Proclamation

HOTAiR: Happy Thanksgiving!

Michelle Malkin: Thanksgiving 2009

Nice Deb: Happy Thanksgiving

Fire Andrea Mitchell: On Thanksgiving eve, Obama issues special message – to Muslims at the Hajj!

Flopping Aces: Thursday (Thanksgiving) Funnies

Western Experience: Happy Thanksgiving!

Instapundit: FRANK J. FLEMING: Things I’m Thankful For….

American Thinker: A Thanksgiving Resolution

Animal Farm: No Separation of Church and State

Climate WARMer’s Global Conspiracy; Ugly Science of Lies Uncovered at Last

‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’
An invention of
Socialist Climate WARMers
who did it for the money


I have long followed the Global Warming debate and controversy, its Socialist Politicization, and the salivating greed of companies like General Electric who have eagerly done sixty-nine with Obama and other Socialists for years just to corner a market for a contrived solution to a non-existent problem… the Myth of Global Warming.

One of the best articles I have see to date on the uncovering of the most damning evidence of Scientific Malpractice since Alchemy is the article by James Delingpole published in the Telegraph in the United Kingdom…

Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’?

By James Delingpole Politics Last updated: November 20th, 2009

If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:

Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.

One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”

But perhaps the most damaging revelations  – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

Here are a few tasters. (So far, we can only refer to them as alleged emails because – though Hadley CRU’s director Phil Jones has confirmed the break-in to Ian Wishart at the Briefing Room – he has yet to fess up to any specific contents.) But if genuine, they suggest dubious practices such as:

Manipulation of evidence:

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:

The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

Suppression of evidence:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?

Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.

Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.

We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.

Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:

Next
time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat
the crap out of him. Very tempted.

Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):

……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….

And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.

“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”

“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”

click here to read the rest of the article…

Continue reading

Leaked Obama Afghan Strategy Revealed; Sets Stage for surrender to Terrorists

What looks to be bi-partisan at first glance, Obama’s leaked plans for agreement to send 34,000 more troops to General McChrystal, is in reality, political window dressing.

It comes with triggers (“off ramps”) that will automatically end the US involvement in prevention of the Taliban and Al Qaeda from retaking Afghanistan and making it their base of operation for their Islamic War of World Wide Terror on all Infidels… specifically, their Islamic War on the United States and her allies, Great Britain, France, and Israel.

In reports provided to McClatchy from US Officials from either the White House or the Pentagon or both, Obama has apparently crafted his own personal exit strategy in order to dodge personal responsibility for a US surrender in Afghanistan.

Further, US Officials said the Obama announcement of the Afghan Decision is scheduled for December 1, 2009, but was made some time ago. This begs the question… what political advantage was it to Obama to delay announcement of the Afghan War Decision? Did it have anything to do with ObamaCare support by Blue Dog Democrats in the House and the Senate? If so what is the worth of a US Soldier’s life when life and death decisions of troops in the field hinge on passing Domestic Policy Legislation?

From McClatchy:

The U.S. officials all spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the issue publicly and because, one official said, the White House is incensed by leaks on its Afghanistan policy that didn’t originate in the White House.

additionally…

The administration’s plan contains “off-ramps,” points starting next June at which Obama could decide to continue the flow of troops, halt the deployments and adopt a more limited strategy or “begin looking very quickly at exiting” the country, depending on political and military progress, one defense official said.

“We have to start showing progress within six months on the political side or military side or that’s it,” the U.S. defense official said.

and it goes on to say…

The administration’s protracted deliberations have escalated into open warfare between McChrystal and his supporters and advocates of a more limited strategy led by Biden and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel that often played out in dueling leaks to news organizations.

It is clear, I believe, that Obama wants to have his cake and to also eat it at the same time.

He does not want to fight a war on terror as he promised the Majority of Americans to get himself elected… and he does not want to take responsibility for surrender either.

Thus, he has constructed himself ‘OFF RAMPS’ to place the crux of ending the US Fight against Al Qaeda on a document created for him by others…

Obama, We the People HIRED YOU to make the call yourself, and to take responsibility for YOUR Decisions …and regardless of what kind of slight of hand mumbo jumbo BS you come up with for appeasing the Radical Leftists, of which they consider you a member, You Will Be the President Who Surrendered To Al Qaeda.. Bank on it Pal!

No wonder your Job Approval Rating hit a new and all time low today…


Continue reading

Obama wants America to Hate Itself; 911-NYT Trials is proof of Rev Wright/Bill Ayers Teachings

Here is a preview
of the coming
Barack Obama WMD:
the ‘Shaming of America’ Agenda

If there was any doubt in any American’s mind as to why Obama decided to move the trials of the five Islamic Jihadist Illegal War Combatants from low key military trials at GITMO where they have already declared their guilt to Highly Visible Civilian Trials only a few blocks from Ground Zero in New York City, let your doubts be forever vanquished.

Obama is hell bent on punishing Americans whom he unquestioningly holds in contempt and revulsion… as does his political teachers: Reverend  Wright and William Ayers.

Sarah Palin is the arch-enemy of the Marxists who have trained and molded Barack Obama his entire life… and taught him well.

Sarah Palin is as American as it gets and reflects the thinking and values of the Majority of America. This is why she is the Socialist’s Public Enemy Number One.

But We the People, the Enemies of Marxism that would own America, enters the Political Arena to do Battle with those in power who hate us… and would have us Bow Down to Marxism and Islam.

We now have a Leader… who is hell bent on taking America back from the Socialists who would have us bow down in shame… bow down to them.

Your Actions Speak Louder that Words, Barack
We the People Hear your Actions Clear as a BELL

YOU ARE GOING DOWN
AS THE PRESIDENT WHO HATES AMERICA

Continue reading

Support for ObamaCare sinks to 38% Nationwide

From Rasmussen Polls Monday, November 23, 2009, on the heels of forward motion for the Senate ObamaCare Bill…

Health Care Reform
Support for Health Care Plan Falls to New Low
Monday, November 23, 2009

Just 38% of voters now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That’s the lowest level of support measured for the plan in nearly two dozen tracking polls conducted since June.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 56% now oppose the plan.

Half the survey was conducted before the Senate voted late Saturday to begin debate on its version of the legislation. Support for the plan was slightly lower in the half of the survey conducted after the Senate vote.

Prior to this, support for the plan had never fallen below 41%. Last week, support for the plan was at 47%. Two weeks ago, the effort was supported by 45% of voters.

Intensity remains stronger among those who oppose the push to change the nation’s health care system: 21% Strongly Favor the plan while 43% are Strongly Opposed.

click here to read the rest..

Speak with the money the socialists are hell bent on spending for you… Send $$$ to SarahPAC to get the Socialists Defeated!!

Click Here To Donate
Freedom is NOT FREE

Continue reading

Obama to Congress: Do as I do – sacrifice reelection to unleash Socialism on an Unwilling America

Obama interview responding to question about his re-election possibilities..

Socialist Senators follow Obama’s lead; committing the act of  political hari kari before the Self-Sacrificial Alter of Marxism…


Americans… you have your country at stake. Take these Socialist Senate Political Martyrs to task and make sure they are defeated in 2010.

They expect it, like so many Islamic Suicide Bombers bent on self-sacrifice for the cause of Islamic World Domination.

Don’t let them come back to Washington DC… for if they do they will laugh at you for the rest of their lives as they continue to drain the lifeblood of American prosperity till there is nothing left.

Below? The list of Socialist Politically Suicidal Senators facing re-election in 2010, and the contact information for each of their offices:

Bayh, Evan – (D – IN) Class III 131 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5623 Web Form: http://bayh.senate.gov/contact/email/

Bennet, Michael F. – (D – CO) Class III 702 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5852 Web Form: http://bennet.senate.gov/contact/

Boxer, Barbara – (D – CA) Class III 112 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 Web Form: http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm

Burris, Roland W. – (D – IL) Class III 387 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2854 Web Form: http://burris.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Dodd, Christopher J. – (D – CT) Class III 448 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2823 Web Form: http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3130

Dorgan, Byron L. – (D – ND) Class III 322 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2551 Web Form: http://dorgan.senate.gov/contact/contact_form.cfm

Feingold, Russell D. – (D – WI) Class III 506 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5323 Web Form: http://feingold.senate.gov/contact_opinion.html

Inouye, Daniel K. – (D – HI) Class III 722 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3934 Web Form: http://inouye.senate.gov/Contact/Email-Form.cfm

Leahy, Patrick J. – (D – VT) Class III 433 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4242 Web Form: http://leahy.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Lincoln, Blanche L. – (D – AR) Class III 355 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4843 Web Form: http://lincoln.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Mikulski, Barbara A. – (D – MD) Class III 503 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4654 Web Form: http://mikulski.senate.gov/Contact/contact.cfm

Murray, Patty – (D – WA) Class III 173 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2621 Web Form: http://murray.senate.gov/email/index.cfm

Reid, Harry – (D – NV) Class III 522 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3542 Web Form: http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Schumer, Charles E. – (D – NY) Class III 313 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-6542 Web Form: http://schumer.senate.gov/new_website/contact.cfm

Specter, Arlen – (D – PA) Class III 711 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4254 http://specter.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm

Wyden, Ron – (D – OR) Class III 223 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5244 Web Form: http://wyden.senate.gov/contact/

H/T to RedState for the list above. I spruced it up some so the names stand out and the links are working links.

Continue reading